- Joined
- May 14, 2005
- Messages
- 12,862
- Reaction score
- 2,846
- Location
- A Small Town in Germany
- Website
- www.sharonmaas.co.uk
aruna said:Anyone care to discuss?
Hinduism, Vedanta, Buddhism, Taoism, Zen... etc etc.
SLake said:Discuss? Do you mean that you have a bone-to-pick, questions maybe, or do you just want to watch people write stuff?
Buddha said that he didn't want people following his beliefs blindly, but he wanted them to think for themselves. But given my experiences with Buddhism, it appears they all wear the robes, don't have sex, and they're vegetarians. I could mistake them for Jehovah's Witnesses, even Bahai, if it weren't for their costumes, but admittedly, Buddhist works are more detailed.
How's that for starters?
SLake said:Practice. A concept meaning repetition. I wonder if there's been anything new since the Vedas, except more practice.
Sorry I'm cynical about religion, East, West, North and South. Science too and definitely politics, and I'm not absolutely sure about myself either I hope someone can extend the dialogue for you in a more traditionally acceptable and practiced way.
aruna said:It doesn't really matter. I don't need it (dialogue). And yes, repetition is the way, till we get it right. A bit like Groundhog Day!
Anyone care to discuss?
Hinduism, Vedanta, Buddhism, Taoism, Zen... etc etc.
I've been curious about Zen. I'm not really sure about the spiritual stuff, but the idea of meditation, clearing the mind, that kind of thing facinates me and I think could help me out.
I have a love-hate relationship with the Eastern religions myself. Just like everywhere else, I see some wonderful insights papered over with layers and layers of social normativity.
I stick with the wonderful insights, ignore the destructiveness and obvious unspirituality of many Hindu so-called traditions, such as caste cruelty. The latter, as I see it, are typical power issues and really have nothing to do with real Vedanta.
(my bold)I am fascinated by the insights, hate the social normativity. I tend to identify as a Hindu heretic, partly because, well, Hindu women aren't supposed to even be looking for truth behind this stuff. Which I think is such nonsense.
Shweta, that is not entirely true. I personally know at least five female Hindus (and have seen, in flesh and blood, and been impressed by, four of them) who are recognized as absolute authorities as Vedantic teachers, with huge followings of Hindu men and greatly respected in India. I can PM you their names if you like. Two of them are still alive. The other three never left India but are quite famous there for their wisdom and compassion. True, it might be difficult in some Hindu communities for a woman to show interest in anything beyond weddings and domestic management, but the wonderful thing about Hinduism is that whatever you can claim about it, the very opposite is also true.
I personally am not much interested in the normative aspects you mention, and as a non-Hindu they are also not important for me to know. And yet no other society, I find is as basically female as Hindu-India; I mean with that, that so-called female values seem to be at the very base of that culture.
And I have the highest respect even for "normal" Hindu women. No other women have so made me aware of my own strength and value as a woman as the ones I met when I first went to India. I left there as a completely different person; and it is actually Indian women who taught me self esteem. It's a phenomenon hard to describe, but for me it was absolutely true.
However, I think as a historical phenomenon, as writer-fodder, the socially normative aspects might be the best bits. It's quite hard to write interesting fiction about altered states, I find; but the different social/cultural aspects have endless possibilities.
Have you read anything by Meera Syal? You should! I recently read Life isn't All Ha Ha Hee Hee... which sounds like a very silly book but is actually excellent, well written and all about the domestic norms you describe, and women who break away from them. Though I took issue with some of the things Syal says about Hinduism in that book... living in England, I think she has not grasped some aspects of her own religion and makes some claims about it that I, as a non-Hindu, know to be wrong!
Shweta, that is not entirely true. I personally know at least five female Hindus (and have seen, in flesh and blood, and been impressed by, four of them) who are recognized as absolute authorities as Vedantic teachers, with huge followings of Hindu men and greatly respected in India. I can PM you their names if you like.
I personally am not much interested in the normative aspects you mention, and as a non-Hindu they are also not important for me to know. And yet no other society, I find is as basically female as Hindu-India; I mean with that, that so-called female values seem to be at the very base of that culture.
Have you read anything by Meera Syal? You should! I recently read Life isn't All Ha Ha Hee Hee... which sounds like a very silly book but is actually excellent, well written and all about the domestic norms you describe, and women who break away from them. Though I took issue with some of the things Syal says about Hinduism in that book... living in England, I think she has not grasped some aspects of her own religion and makes some claims about it that I, as a non-Hindu, know to be wrong!
Certainly the notion of Shakti is a principally female one, and that interests me a great deal. It's not how things were, though, growing up as a Hindu girl -- I had to move to the States to find out that Hindu female figures weren't always supposed to be meek!
And think of Draupadi, in the Mahabharata! Five highly desirable husbands, each one willing to do her bidding the moment she raised a little finger. And the whole war fought because she was insulted.
I'm a Buddhist. Buddhism is about walking the path, not talking about walking the path. So you can't really judge Buddhism on what you've read about it or heard people say about it. You have to to judge it based on what you feel once you've actually walked the path for awhile.
.
Same for Vedanta, especially the Advaita aspect of it. It's actually silence, not talking at all. And actually, I'm quite happy that Vedanta never achieved the populist appreciation that Buddhism did; it's far less crowded here. It also means that everyone mentions Buddhism or Zen when they talk about "Godless" religions, especially atheists. It means that you Buddhists get a lot more talkers!
However, even within an established practice an exchange can be fruitful and helpful and should not be ruled out. This is why I started this thread.