Black MP accused of racism - thoughts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
Labour MP Diane Abbott - Britain's first ever Black female MP - has been accused of racism after Tweeting: "'White people love playing 'divide & rule'. We should not play their game."

Explosions of righteous indignation abounded from the (largely WHITE) political parties, who each cheerfully shoved forward the closest available PoC politician to say how this wasn't okay and no form of racism is allowed. (Unsurprisingly, the Tories had to dig quite deep into the back benches before they could find someone)

From the BBC article:
BBC said:
Labour's Chuka Umunna said party leader Ed Miliband had told Ms Abbott her remarks were "unacceptable".
...
Shadow Business Secretary Mr Umunna told the BBC: "Ed Miliband has spoken to her this morning and made it very clear in no uncertain terms that the contents of the tweet were unacceptable.
In a statement, the Labour Party said: "We disagree with Diane's tweet.

"It is wrong to make sweeping generalisations about any race, creed, or culture.
But Conservative MP Nadhim Zahawi told BBC Radio 5live her comments were "intolerable".

"This is racism," he said. "If this was a white member of Parliament saying that all black people want to do bad things to us he would have resigned within the hour or be sacked.

"For a shadow minister to hold these sort of views is intolerable, it is wrong, she needs to go."

Diane Abbott has since apologised and said her remarks were taken out of context. In fact the tweet was part of a larger conversation about race relations and a discussion about the term "Black community leaders".

Leaving aside the sheer hilarity of the I-spoke-to-a-Black-man-once-Conservatives wheeling out a non-White back-bencher to accuse a Black woman of racism, what are your thoughts on this story?

Of course, in the simplest-possible interpretation of events, an MP made a sweeping generalisation about a particular racial group. The Sun gleefully called her a hypocrite ("She doesn't want White people to be racist to Blacks but it's okay for Blacks to be racists to Whites!"); The New Statesman went with "Let's not pretend that Diane Abbott's comments were genuine racism". They are, however, a lone voice in the crowd of people going "Oh this is racism. No question".

But if individuals from minority communities can't point out discriminatory, colonialist or racist behaviour in the White majority, how can they work to tackle those issues? How can we move towards a truly post-race society if any criticism of White people is shut down in a storm of righteous indignation?

Should White people maybe just take a long hard look at history and suck it the hell up?

I'm honestly not sure what to think about this.

ETA: DAMMIT there is already a thread about this which I only saw five minutes AFTER writing this all out.
 
Last edited:

Thump

defying grabbity
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
288
Location
Spending one short day in the Emerald City
Should White people maybe just take a long hard look at history and suck it the hell up?

Well, no, because whatever may have happened in the past, we are not responsible for our ancestor's behaviors. Sins of the father and all that.

There is no such thing as "racial guilt" or whatever it's called because if you look back objectively, you'll quickly find that every race, group, creed etc. has been guilty of some atrocity at some point in their history so if any one group is guilty for the crimes of "their kind" then we are all guilty of something.

That's not to say that I think racist comments or any other kind of discrimination should be disregarded but the idea of equality is that everyone gets treated them same, i.e. they have the same opportunities but also suffer the same consequences for misbehavior regardless of their background. Hate is hate regardless who is doing the hating. You can't ask people to treat you like a person if you're not willing to do the same, whatever you label yourself.

That said, what applies to the common person and what applies to politicians is also very different.

IMO, any sort of grouping of people by race and attributing them any positive/negative characteristic in comparison to another IS racist at some level, the gravity of it is measured by the reach of the person. I would tut tut at her statement if she were my next door neighbour, same as I would for a white neighbour making the same sort of comment about Blacks. But as she is a politician, I expect her to be held to the same standards as politicians of any other ethnicity.

The words in that tweet may not be that big a deal coming from Mrs. Nobody but they are from a politician with the potential to reach a lot of people. It's true that when a White politician says something like this they are expected to resign. I don't think it's unfair to expect the same from a Black one (or Asian or whatever else), on the contrary, I think it's right.

I'm a hardcore feminist and one thing that really incenses me is when women get off more lightly than men for the same offenses. Any discrimination, "positive" or negative, is really just saying "we're different and we as {insert group here} are better, but we'll humor you for a bit, pet".

At least, that's how I live it :)
 

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
It's a racist statement. If she wants to speak about the history of predominantly white nations exhibiting a history of discriminatory, colonialist or racist behavior, a person in her position should say precisely that and not make a generalization. I don't think there is any excuse for doing otherwise.
 

missesdash

You can't sit with us!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
6,858
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Paris, France
I'm torn because I've yet to decide whether or not I accept the"power+prejudice" definition of racism.

If I subscribe to that belief, her comment isn't racist.

Regardless, her comment was irresponsible. Still, it's amazing how quick people are to interrupt a conversation about white supremacy by bringing up the insipid "reverse racism" card. The large conversation was certainly more important than a comment taken out of context. This is a major derail.
 

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
I'm torn because I've yet to decide whether or not I accept the"power+prejudice" definition of racism.

Personally, I accept that definition for supremacism, but not racism. Otherwise we'd basically be saying that PoC's can't be racist even toward other PoC's who aren't in a predominant position of power, which seems absurd to me.

And yes, it's a derail, but that's all the more reason why someone in her position has to be precise in her language. History tells us that, of course, such a statement is going to be followed by a derail, and you can't count on your opponents to keep the conversation on track, obviously, so you can't provide them any opportunity to seize and steer the conversation into the direction they want to take it.
 
Last edited:

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
I'm torn because I've yet to decide whether or not I accept the"power+prejudice" definition of racism.

If I subscribe to that belief, her comment isn't racist.

Regardless, her comment was irresponsible. Still, it's amazing how quick people are to interrupt a conversation about white supremacy by bringing up the insipid "reverse racism" card. The large conversation was certainly more important than a comment taken out of context. This is a major derail.

To me, it keeps coming down to two things:

1. This was a comment made as part of a wider conversation she was having about the Black community, with another individual on Twitter, in the wake of the verdicts in the Stephen Lawrence murder case (in brief: Black teenager murdered by gang of White teenagers 18 years ago. Police royally f-ed up original investigation, accused of institutionalised racism. Finally, two men convicted of the murder almost twenty years after it happened). So in the wake of this she was talking about the Black community and "Black community leaders" and the importance of solidarity in minority groups etc etc, and she made this comment as part of that discussion.
Predictably, people have picked up on this one part of the wider conversation (a massive derail, as you say) and started yelling about how racist it is, ignoring the fact that Ms Abbott was discussing very real issues faced by a minority community. Instituionalised racism? Remnants of colonialism still affecting daily lives of PoC? Black teenagers being stabbed to death by White people who get away with it for 18 years? Forget all that shit! The slighted feelings of over-privileged White people are MUCH more important!

Which brings me to...
2. This gleeful "look at the Black woman being racist!"-fest ignores the fact that Britain is NOT post-race and NOT racially equal. White people still enjoy an enormous amount of unearned privilege simply by virtue of being White. All the White people complaining about how racist this is have probably, 99.9% certainly NEVER been on the receiving end of racial abuse; been told to "go back where they come from"; had racial slurs and insults thrown at them; been stop-searched solely on the basis of their race; been denied jobs solely because of their race; been treated differently in the classroom because of their skin colour; been treated with undue suspicion and mistrust by the police because of their skin colour; or been made to feel that they are not truly "British" because of their race. NONE of these things have ever happened to them.
So when I see these people - White people, hugely privileged and yet totally unaware of that privilege, totally oblivious to what it is actually like to be a minority in Britain - when I see them moaning about how racist this is, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

I know that she made a generalistion based on race, which I can see, yes, that's not really fair and she should have been more clear or maybe NOT tweeted it in a public place where everyone can see. You could read that as racism if you define racism as "stereotyping/judging based on race", so very simplistically it's racist. But the reaction to it is completely out of proportion. This is on the "I say, steady on," end of the scale of offence, and everyone's acting like it's at the "That, sir, is an act of war!" end.


It's also worth pointing out that when White politicians and public figures are accused of racism, there's usually plenty of people falling over themselves to explain how it's NOT racist because of blah blah blah. Yet when it's a Black woman saying something ill advised, everyone's all "RACISM! RACISM!" and doesn't care about the nuance.

I don't know. I see the racial generalisation. I see that it's kinda unfair. I see that it's ill-advised to say that publicly on Twitter. But the reaction to it just leaves me with the distinct impression of a lot of very privileged people gleefully leaping on one mistake so they can act all hard-done-by and victimised.
 

missesdash

You can't sit with us!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
6,858
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Paris, France
That's exactly what rubs me the wrong way. People LOVE making these kind of arguments. It's so validating for them. "see! see! She's racist too!"

That's why I called it a derail. It's so obvious what they're doing.
 

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
I don't know. I see the racial generalisation. I see that it's kinda unfair. I see that it's ill-advised to say that publicly on Twitter. But the reaction to it just leaves me with the distinct impression of a lot of very privileged people gleefully leaping on one mistake so they can act all hard-done-by and victimised.

I wouldn't dispute this, but I would say that when you're aware of what the typical reaction to such a statement would be based on history, you have to know better than to make such a statement. Especially on Twitter, where you have to type it out and then hit send and can't chalk it up to misspeaking. You're not in position to change the game and you're only going to sabotage whatever relevant argument you're trying to make by inviting this backlash, however disproportional. You just have to know better.
 

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
That's exactly what rubs me the wrong way. People LOVE making these kind of arguments. It's so validating for them. "see! see! She's racist too!"

That's why I called it a derail. It's so obvious what they're doing.

It also furthers this myth of parity: that somehow, one Black woman's ill-advised generalisation on Twitter is just as bad as all the racism and discrimination BME communities in the UK have to deal with. It's all "See? We're racist, they're racist, everyone can be racist! Stop blaming us and making us feel bad!"
 

missesdash

You can't sit with us!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
6,858
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Paris, France
It also furthers this myth of parity: that somehow, one Black woman's ill-advised generalisation on Twitter is just as bad as all the racism and discrimination BME communities in the UK have to deal with. It's all "See? We're racist, they're racist, everyone can be racist! Stop blaming us and making us feel bad!"

Exactly. And it's the kind of thing that will be used as cannon fodder for the next decade anytime she wants to talk about white racism.
 

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
I wouldn't dispute this, but I would say that when you're aware of what the typical reaction to such a statement would be based on history, you have to know better than to make such a statement. Especially on Twitter, where you have to type it out and then hit send and can't chalk it up to misspeaking. You're not in position to change the game and you're only going to sabotage whatever relevant argument you're trying to make by inviting this backlash, however disproportional. You just have to know better.

Yeah, I understand this. I mean, the statement was totally ill-advised and I'd go so far as to say the whole discussion was probably not a good one to have on Twitter, in snippets of 140 characters. But what gets me is how many White public figures seem to get up on stage or Twitter or the football pitch or TV and just open their mouths and spew outrageously racist BS. I don't see David Cameron watching every word he says lest he causes offence (*points at hugely insulting generalisations about the Muslim community, made by Cameron last year*). Or David Starkey. Or John Terry.

There's often a double standard applied to minority communities: they must be cleaner-than-clean, because any slip up is viciously pounced upon as evidence that they are "just as bad as White people".

It's not what she said so much as the way everyone is reacting to it that's making me uncomfortable.
 

Thump

defying grabbity
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
288
Location
Spending one short day in the Emerald City
I don't see it that way, possibly (probably?) because I identify as White (though, technically I'm half Hispanic I guess, but I don't look it or identify with that part of my heritage).

Anyone with any sense knows who still holds the power and that parity is still a dream in the works for ethnic minorities, women, LGBT and other non-white-male groups but I don't know how we'll get there if the previously secure and cozy White folks don't start feeling a little of what it feels like to be victimized. I know I'm quite naive about these issues or maybe I have a lot of common sense about how the world should be and other people are insane but yeah...

ETA: oops, you guys moved on >___< I was answering the post with the comment on parity.
 
Last edited:

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
Yeah, I understand this. I mean, the statement was totally ill-advised and I'd go so far as to say the whole discussion was probably not a good one to have on Twitter, in snippets of 140 characters. But what gets me is how many White public figures seem to get up on stage or Twitter or the football pitch or TV and just open their mouths and spew outrageously racist BS. I don't see David Cameron watching every word he says lest he causes offence (*points at hugely insulting generalisations about the Muslim community, made by Cameron last year*). Or David Starkey. Or John Terry.

There's often a double standard applied to minority communities: they must be cleaner-than-clean, because any slip up is viciously pounced upon as evidence that they are "just as bad as White people".

It's not what she said so much as the way everyone is reacting to it that's making me uncomfortable.

Understandable. The way I tend to see these things, though, is that it's already known how the game is played. If you'll allow me to just torture the hell out of this "game" analogy that I can't seem to shake... if you already know things are stacked against you and your side is far behind on the scoreboard, and if you are going to step into a role of "leadership," then you take on a responsibility of having to be that much better than your counterparts. You can't afford to make similar mistakes. Just can't. It's shitty, but it's reality, and the most efficient way to combat it isn't to dwell on what's unfair, in my opinion. I'd rather go for the victory first, then go back and analyze what's unfair.
 

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
Understandable. The way I tend to see these things, though, is that it's already known how the game is played. If you'll allow me to just torture the hell out of this "game" analogy that I can't seem to shake... if you already know things are stacked against you and your side is far behind on the scoreboard, and if you are going to step into a role of "leadership," then you take on a responsibility of having to be that much better than your counterparts. You can't afford to make similar mistakes. Just can't. It's shitty, but it's reality, and the most efficient way to combat it isn't to dwell on what's unfair, in my opinion. I'd rather go for the victory first, then go back and analyze what's unfair.
I get this. I just... I think that it's really unfair and it depresses me. I mean the way people are reacting you'd think she'd declared war on White people or something.


I think this pretty much sums up why I have a problem with this story:

David Starkey name-drops Enoch Powell and says "The Whites have become Black", and blames Black culture for the rioting in Britain last summer. Toby Young goes forth to the Telegraph blog to explain to everyone that this is not, in fact, racist.

Diane Abbott remarks briefly on Twitter that "white people love to play divide and rule". Toby Young goes forth to the Telegraph blog to explain how terribly racist this is and how Diane Abbott is probably a racist too and there's no excuse for this and what if a White person did it?

Well we know what would happen if a White person said something like this. Toby Young would defend them as 'not racist' on the Telegraph blog.

It is fucking bullshit.
 
Last edited:

crunchyblanket

the Juggernaut of Imperfection
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
766
Location
London's grey and pleasant land
I get this. I just... I think that it's really unfair and it depresses me. I mean the way people are reacting you'd think she'd declared war on White people or something.


I think this pretty much sums up why I have a problem with this story:

David Starkey name-drops Enoch Powell and says "The Whites have become Black", and blames Black culture for the rioting in Britain last summer. Toby Young goes forth to the Telegraph blog to explain to everyone that this is not, in fact, racist.

Diane Abbott remarks briefly on Twitter that "white people love to play divide and rule". Toby Young goes forth to the Telegraph blog to explain how terribly racist this is and how Diane Abbott is probably a racist too and there's no excuse for this and what if a White person did it?

Well we know what would happen if a White person said something like this. Toby Young would defend them as 'not racist' on the Telegraph blog.

It is fucking bullshit.

I've said all I have to say about this in the other thread, so I'll just say...I agree with this post.
 

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
Those reactions are bullshit. The Toby Young example is amazing. That is a perfect illustration of the kind of illogical standards many folks do apply.

I commented on the other thread, and I'm not comfortable with her phrasing. I'm just hoping we all get on the same page about generalisations, especially to keep it simple and clear for young folks growing up. Not that her gaffe was any kind of the big deal some people are making it out to be!
 

Wayne K

Banned
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
21,564
Reaction score
8,082
Should White people maybe just take a long hard look at history and suck it the hell up?

No

Well we know what would happen if a White person said something like this.

That's an unfair statement. White people are punished for racist statements all the time. Is it equal? No. But nothing is
 
Last edited:

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
That's an unfair statement. White people are punished for racist statements all the time. Is it equal? No. But nothing is

No, it's obviously not an "unfair statement" in the context of her post as it relates to Toby Young. It's a very precise statement in the proper context as it relates to Toby Young, in fact.
 

Wayne K

Banned
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
21,564
Reaction score
8,082
No, it's obviously not an "unfair statement" in the context of her post as it relates to Toby Young. It's a very precise statement in the proper context as it relates to Toby Young, in fact.

I thought they were two separate things. I didn't see the context

Sorry, the "Should white people suck it the hell up" comment has me a little sensitive
 

Jcomp

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
5,352
Reaction score
1,422
For my part, I don't think white people should "suck it the hell up" any more than a PoC or other potentially marginalized party should "get over it" in regard to whatever past hardship has set the stage / played a part in the current state of race / social relations and inequality.

For Diane Abbott's part, ultimately, she has to be more aware of what's at stake and how she will be vilified if she makes a careless statement like that, and how it can undermine anything positive she's trying to accomplish. That's her responsibility. History indicates that there is a significant and vocal segment of the white population that gets defensive if not outright furious in such situations. Saying that this should just stop isn't going to change anything in any significant manner. I understand being pissed off at people like Toby Young for their hypocrisy, but I'm at a point now where I'm more interested in results and production. Employ tactics that will allow your team to advance, prosper and win. Maybe it's the aspiring CEO in me. When the stakes are this high, I don't think people should have high expectations of an asshole like Toby Young, but I do think people should have high expectations for a pioneering black MP. I'd love to cut her some slack, but unfortunately that's a luxury, especially when it's such an easy mistake to avoid. She has to do better.
 

thebloodfiend

Cory
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
630
Age
30
Location
New York
Website
www.thebooklantern.com
I can see how her statement can be interpreted as racist, but I don't see it that way. I have a hard time believing that crowds of white people are just so offended by what she said. I think the comment was stupid, but I think it's highly hypocritical for her to be called out like this, while people like Ron Paul skate by on claims of sheer ignorance. They're both politicians.

I don't think white people should just suck it up. I think there should be room for a discussion on white privilege and white guilt, though.

I mean, is the video NT posted yesterday racist because it makes a generalization about white girls? And if it was Shit Black Girls Say, would that be racist? Even if it is just humor?
 

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
I really hope it's implied that it's Shit Some White Girls Say. Since it's humor, the precision doesn't have to be there, imho. But if anyone seriously believes all white girls are like that, I'm offended by that belief, yeah. "But I know a white girl who does that" doesn't work very well to paint all of us, either.

The subconscious racism and privilege arguments are different, I think. That's so societally ingrained and below the surface that it makes sense why folks haven't conquered that yet, because they were harder to notice. I really do believe those things are truly incredibly widespread.
 

Rufus Coppertop

Banned
Flounced
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
3,935
Reaction score
948
Location
.
If someone makes a sweeping, condemnatory statement about a group of people, based on the colour of their skin, it's racist.

If that person gets a stern talking to and a slap on the wrist for it, good!
 
Last edited:

Psychomacologist

The Sarcasm Fairy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
640
Location
Midlands, UK
To clarify to people who don't like this:
Should White people maybe just take a long hard look at history and suck it the hell up?
It is a question, not a statement. Because I honestly don't know if I think this. I mean, one very cynical and emotional part of me is going "Oh, FFS White people, get the hell over yourselves already!" but I know that's not really fair. I don't honestly think we should just let something like this go. But then I look to the history of racism, and the fact that White people today still benefit from the racism and colonialism of the past, and it just annoys me that so many people are ignoring the wider social and cultural context of this and viewing the statement as if it were said in a vacuum.

The other thing is, and this is a big part of why I'm annoyed about all this - when a White person says something racist/racefaily/inappropriate/offensive, there's usually plenty of people queueing up to explain how this isn't racist at all and everyone is just making a fuss. Take, for example, the SlutWalk debacle in America recently, where a young White woman turned up with a sign saying "Woman is the N***er of the world". In the resulting internet shitstorm, there were plenty of (mainly White) people saying that this girl didn't mean to cause offence and it's a John Lennon song and why was everyone getting upset. Or, in other words: "Suck it up, Black people - White girls can say n***er if they want!"

David Starkey says something blatantly racist? Suck it up, Black community - he didn't mean all of you! In the other thread, someone linked to the twitter stream of comments in response to Liverpool FC player Suarez racially abusing another footballer. And so many people are saying Evra is a grass, he's a sissy, he's a wimp (along with plenty of racial slurs) - in other words, he should just suck it up and not complain. Complaining about racism makes you a grass and a sissy.

PoC are told to "suck it up" all the time.

It is usually the case, when people from minority communities try to draw attention to racism or racist portrayals in fiction/film or discrimination or rampant White privilege, that a bunch of (usually White) people will dismiss such claims as "making a fuss" or "seeing racism everywhere" or "being oversensitive". People will defend the racism. They'll say "If you don't like it, don't watch it/read it/listen to it!" Derailing for Dummies was written by someone who saw the same dismissive and belittling attitude repeated over and over again, every time anyone from a minority group tried to draw attention to discrimination or racism.

And yet, the minute a Black woman says something racist about White people, a zero-tolerance policy is advocated.

It's not individuals to blame for this - it's just a social attitude. It's a society-wide phenomenon.

If I was to be particularly vindictive and cynical, I'd suggest that if White people really want in on the "victims of racism" party, they should have the whole experience. They should experience the sweeping racial generalistion, and then they should listen to lots of Black people explain how this isn't racism at all, and they should experience the frustration of trying to get their complaint heard whilst every single point on the "Derailing for Dummies" list is thrown at them; they should experience not just the racism but the accompanying dismissal, the accusations of over-sensitivity, the suggestions that the community "deserves it" for one spurious reason or another, and the general belittling of their complaints as not really that important. They should go through all this in a society that routinely under-privileges them because of their skin colour, and where despite best efforts very real and dangerous racism against them still persists, so this one comment is just part of the whole fabric of overt and subtle discrimination they have to deal with in their day to day lives. Maybe then I'll be inclined to throw a pity party for all the White people who are soooo offended and upset by Diane Abbott's statements.

I'm sorry if this seems harsh or unfair. But I am honestly so sick of people acting like this one thing she said somehow makes White people just as much the victims of racism as BME people. Because it doesn't. Not by a long, looong way. It means that for once, for ONCE, White people are finding out what it's like to have racial discrimination come back the other way.

Because yes, what she said was unfair. Yes, it was a racial stereotype and therefore racist. Yes, she shouldn't have said it and she was right to apologise. But it is one incident in a society where still the vast majority of racism is by White people, towards Black people and other minority groups. The context is this is a tiny blip on the radar in a culture that routinely privileges White people and disadvantages everyone else. So whilst people are of course well within their rights to be offended and demand an apology, and Diane Abbott was absolutely right to apologise and retract her statement, can we please stop pretending that we're all equal and everyone is equally victimised. Because it's not true.

Okay I think I'm done now. I'm honestly quite upset about all this, so if this post comes off as overwrought I apologise. I'm just really sick of the hypocritical attitude of people (I'm looking at you, BBC and other news outlets) who will ignore hundreds of tweets calling Evra a f****** n**** black c*** and a grass and a sissy (who cares about the racial abuse of a Black man?) but will latch onto and make a huge fuss over one tweet with one insensitive remark about White people. The whole thing is just, "Racism towards White people is much more important than racism towards BME people" and that makes me sick.

I hope I haven't offended anyone. I'm still trying to get all this straight in my head.
 

crunchyblanket

the Juggernaut of Imperfection
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
766
Location
London's grey and pleasant land
David Starkey says something blatantly racist? Suck it up, Black community - he didn't mean all of you! In the other thread, someone linked to the twitter stream of comments in response to Liverpool FC player Suarez racially abusing another footballer. And so many people are saying Evra is a grass, he's a sissy, he's a wimp (along with plenty of racial slurs) - in other words, he should just suck it up and not complain. Complaining about racism makes you a grass and a sissy.
The irony is, most of the people upset about Abbott's words seem to be the same people defending Starkey, and John Terry, and Suarez, and Jeremy Clarkson ('it's only a joke!') The same people who get upset about the 'PC Brigade' ruining it for everyone, and complain about people playing 'the race card'. That's what delegitimises a lot of the upset, for me. There's a whole lot of hypocrisy at play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.