It's because you aren't pretentious enough.
Really? Are you asking this?
Writing has gone through eras, and the differences in eras mean there has been changes.
(no offense) But your question is like asking: "Why don't we draw our books out in blood on cave walls?"
It defeats the purpose of change, doesn't it?
Anyways, let's attack your question from a scientific method:
1. Most people do not have the same vocabulary. Some say it's because they had a very expanded vocabulary back then, and some say that it was the changing and adapting of the English language that led to the filtering of words and the standardization of what we use today.
2. We do write like Shakespeare. We steal ideas, stories and write to the people who matter most with our writing.
3. Modern written plays have a choice of writing as back in the Shakespearean era. But they choose a language that most can understand.
4. It's a difficult vocabulary to understand and even more to write with.
5. It doesn't sell.
6. We don't want classes to understand why author 1's book doesn't make sense.
I got more if you need them.
EDIT:
Shakespeare was the figure head for his "fan service" back in the day, thus making him more important to the history books. I do not believe that Shakespeare was, and will ever be a good writer. IMO
I need a mind-condom. 'Cause I've just been mindf**cked.
Shakespeare was the figure head for his "fan service" back in the day, thus making him more important to the history books. I do not believe that Shakespeare was, and will ever be a good writer. IMO
(or try to)
Shhh.... It's ok...
Breathe....
An example is back in the day thin women were seen as less attractive than more round/thick women.
This topic 'tis but a passing sorrow,
Would they grant us leave to see the morrow.
This topic 'tis but a passing sorrow,
Would they grant us leave to see the morrow.
I get people not reading Shakespeare, or even not enjoying Shakespeare, but an objectively bad writer? Maybe I'd find it easier to swallow if people could name a contemporary of his they preferred. Marlowe, perhaps? Ben Johnson?
It's sort of like how it's hard to get someone slagging on the Beatles if all they listen to is Katy Perry. The criticisms would have more weight if the argument was instead that the Beach Boys had better production or the Rolling Stones had catchier hooks.
I get people not reading Shakespeare, or even not enjoying Shakespeare, but an objectively bad writer? Maybe I'd find it easier to swallow if people could name a contemporary of his they preferred. Marlowe, perhaps? Ben Johnson?
It's sort of like how it's hard to get someone slagging on the Beatles if all they listen to is Katy Perry. The criticisms would have more weight if the argument was instead that the Beach Boys had better production or the Rolling Stones had catchier hooks.
I need a mind-condom. 'Cause I've just been mindf**cked.
Shakespeare died on (supposedly) the 23rd of April in 1616. 395 years later, in 2011, some person on the internets claims he's a bad writer, and that his fame is overrated... I could live with being that kind of bad, to be honest.
5. It doesn't sell.
Shakespeare died on (supposedly) the 23rd of April in 1616. 395 years later, in 2011, some person on the internets claims he's a bad writer, and that his fame is overrated... I could live with being that kind of bad, to be honest.
I see it as everything in this world is wrong and right at the same time.
Shakespeare could write, but his ideas, content anything to that writing has been stolen from others around his time.