Originally posted by Carradee 07-08-2011, 07:58 PM:
Read what I actually wrote, please.
Originally Posted by
Carradee
For example, Dean Wesley Smith talks about it here. (Yes, he's an author—but he also ran a publishing company at one point, and he's evidently getting his self-published books ordered by indie bookstores now.)
(bold added).
See it now? I was specifically referring to
indie bookstores.
Originally Posted by
HapiSofi
You misunderstood what he was saying. Go back and read it again. Those aren't unique discounts that only he offers. Those are the standard discounts that all publishers offer.
No, you misunderstood me. I referenced the discounts as a side comment to encourage those interested to go see what Dean says for himself rather than ask me to repeat what he said when that wasn't even my point.
Here's my point: some folks disagree about returns being necessary, which may or may not be connected to particular niche markets.
Originally Posted by
HapiSofi
I don't. Get the facts, give us the specifics, or it doesn't fly.
Listing specifics would make obvious where I live. I hide where I live for safety reasons, because I don't want a close relative to end up dead. That isn't an exaggeration.
I also don't have permission from my sources to list the specifics I do have, which would make listing those specifics a breach of etiquette. (A breach here, anyway; I realize that etiquette varies with region.)
And, since my point was that some folks believe that accepting returns is unnecessary to get into
indie bookstores, and that it may or may not be specifically the case for certain niche markets. Specific data would be asking for an argument, anyway; which isn't what I wanted. I'm bringing up a point, not trying to prove it beyond all doubt.
Now does that make sense?
==================
Originally posted by willietheshakes 07-08-2011, 08:12 PM:
Originally Posted by
Carradee
And, since my point was that some folks believe that accepting returns is unnecessary to get into indie bookstores, and that it may or may not be specifically the case for certain niche markets. Specific data would be asking for an argument, anyway; which isn't what I wanted. I'm bringing up a point, not trying to prove it beyond all doubt.
Now does that make sense?
While I can't speak for ALL indie booksellers (see the "indie"), I CAN speak for mine, for which I do the self-pub buying: if it's non-returnable, I don't even look at it, let alone consider bringing it in. Period.
===============
Originally posted by mscelina 07-08-2011, 08:18 PM:
Agreed. It all goes down to the same bottom line: profit margin.
So the chances of making it into a brick and mortar bookstore like Barnes and Noble are virtually nil. Even for Dean Wesley Smith.
==================
Originally posted by veinglory 07-08-2011, 09:21 PM:
Okay, yes, you can get some non-returnable books into indue and special stores, that was stated from the very beginning. However even they may require a consignment copy.
I believe OP was asking about widespread distribution=chain stores. Chain stores increasingly don't even have a manager let alone a buyer. If they have a buyer s/he likely uses a computer system that will not order outside of standard terms.
I had a *hell* of a time getting local chain stores to order my book under standard terms because it happens to be POD--and the higher ups kept cancelling the order on the mistaken assumption the book was not returnable.
==================
Originally posted by HapiSofi on 07-10-2011 03:49 AM:
Originally Posted by
Carradee
Read what I actually wrote, please.
But I did. I'm rather good at reading. You'd almost think I did that sort of thing for a living.
(Carradee quotes irrelevant bit about Dean Smith.)
See it now? I was specifically referring to
indie bookstores.
Do you not understand that the need to offer standard discounts and make your books returnable applies to independent
bookstores too? The only difference is that indies are theoretically capable of making an exception. It doesn't mean they want to, or that they'll do it for you, or that they'll think kindly of you for asking. It's a considerable inconvenience to them.
Furthermore, what you were "specifically referring to" wasn't returnability; it was offering standard discounts. They aren't the same thing. You mistook DWS's discussion of standard discounts for special discounts he'd come up with on his own.
No, you misunderstood me. I referenced the discounts as a side comment to encourage those interested to go see what Dean says for himself rather than ask me to repeat what he said when that wasn't even my point.
You're not fooling anyone, you know.
Insisting that you're right when you aren't is a very bad habit. In the short run, it makes you look ridiculous. In the long run, it can ruin your life. For your own sake, I sincerely hope you'll knock it off.
Here's my point: some folks disagree about returns being necessary, which may or may not be connected to particular niche markets.
I don't care. You're still wrong. If these "some folks" of yours exist, they're wrong too. And if you think I'm going to keep trying to persuade you, think again. I don't care whether your books get into
bookstores. If you care about it, offer standard discounts and make them returnable.
Or don't. It's up to you.
*shrugs* I also know of Christian presses that don't use the returns system, and they get their books stocked by Christian bookstores.
I don't. Get the facts, give us the specifics, or it doesn't fly.
Listing specifics would make obvious where I live. I hide where I live for safety reasons, because I don't want a close relative to end up dead. That isn't an exaggeration.
Malarkey. Among other things, you put your name and address on your copyright filing. Publishers aren't anonymous.
Besides, if there really are nogoodniks out there who are so insanely motivated to track down you and/or your relative that they're cross-correlating all mentions of
bookstores in obscure online discussions, on the off-chance that you'll be one of the people in that discussion, they'll be able to recognize you under the pseudonym, and the cross-correlated bookstore locations will reveal where you're living, then give up now, because they're going to find you.
I also don't have permission from my sources to list the specifics I do have, which would make listing those specifics a breach of etiquette. (A breach here, anyway; I realize that etiquette varies with region.)
B*llsh*t. It's not a secret which books by which publishers are on sale in which
bookstores. If I phone and ask them, they'll tell me. There's also an online database that will tell me. It's not open access, but it's neither expensive nor exclusive, and a
lot of people use it.
And, since my point was that some folks believe that accepting returns is unnecessary to get into indie bookstores, and that it may or may not be specifically the case for certain niche markets. Specific data would be asking for an argument, anyway; which isn't what I wanted. I'm bringing up a point, not trying to prove it beyond all doubt.
The point is still wrong, still irrelevant, still unsubstantiated, and now has even less credibility than it did last time you trotted it out.
If you don't want to have an argument, shut up and stop arguing. As long as you're still pumping out erroneous information in this public forum, I and others will keep telling you that it's wrong.
Now does that make sense?
Sorry, no. It's the same nonsense, just at greater length.
===================
Originally posted by scope 07-10-2011 06:59 AM:
Originally Posted by
Carradee
I've known bookstore employees who called the entire returns policy silly, but they weren't going to say no to any who offered them such a singularly beneficial policy. Because that's who the policy benefits: the bookstore. Not the publisher.
*shrugs* I also know of Christian presses that don't use the returns system, and they get their books stocked by Christian bookstores.
These "bookstore employees" are the ones who are silly.
The majority of books found in a brick and mortar bookstore would never be bought and stocked if there wasn't a return policy. Or, at best, a bookstore would only by
one copy of most books since they coudn't risk losing money. The entire publisher/bookstore system was built on a
bookstores ability to buy books and have the right to return them. Accordingly, to do so is a necessity for publishers and
bookstores, not a "singularly beneficial policy". The idea for both publishers and
bookstores is that
bookstores sell books and turn a profit. If you eliminated a return policy you would have to develop an entirely new system.
============