Judging a book by its 'dust cover' - Univ. library cuts staff and stock

poetinahat

say it loud
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
21,851
Reaction score
10,441
http://www.smh.com.au/national/educ...-cuts-its-staff-and-stock-20110511-1ej0z.html

Items not borrowed for five years would be targeted but nothing would be moved to storage or discarded without consultation with academics.

As much as 58 per cent of monographs had not been used in five years and talks were under way to find a storage site, he said.

Angry staff and students said the university had failed to consider alternatives, such as adding floors. It was a ''false equation'' to say books that were not borrowed were unused, one woman said. Many were read in the library and not taken out. Mr Shipp said that was true of only 2 per cent of unborrowed books. Pressed on how he could know, he replied: ''We do the dust test.''

The Cindy McCreery mentioned in the article is no relation, as far as I know.
 
Last edited: