Gunshot wound to the arm - aftermath?

thethinker42

Abnormal Romance Author
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
20,759
Reaction score
2,707
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Website
www.gallagherwitt.com
The set in stone, can't-be-changed-because-the-prequel-is-published facts: My character is shot in the arm, and there's damage done to the brachial artery. He almost bleeds out, but survives. Weapon was a .45 cal at approx 12-15 feet.

So...I'm researching how he'll recover. What kind of problems would he have while recovering from something like this? Damage to the muscle? Nerves? Etc? Short term? Long term? I haven't decided if the story picks up within a day or two of the wound, or a few weeks down the line, but it'll be after he's out of the woods in terms of bleeding out (obviously still at risk of things like infection, etc., but the emergency is over).

Any help would be most appreciated. :)
 

thothguard51

A Gentleman of a refined age...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
1,064
Age
72
Location
Out side the beltway...
I would start the story a few months or so down the line unless his rehabilitation is part of the story. My then, his major damage should be minimized and he would more than likely just do self rehabilitation exercises or treatments.

A 45 is pretty big slug and does a lot of damage. If no bones were hit, the muscle damage can be repaired, it just takes a lot of time, depending on the victims previous health. Repairing the Artery is the easy part, and nerves in muscles will reroute or regenerate as well, just along new path ways....

Muscles in the arms and legs can regenerate and they are experimenting with heart patients, by taking samples of their own muscles, growing new muscle cells, and then injecting them directly into the heart to repair damaged hearts, since the heart is ... a muscle.
 

GregS

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
135
Reaction score
19
Location
Seattle, WA
You can get away with quite a lot in terms of how well he recovers, but the general assumption would be serious muscle damage, decreased range of motion, and likely nerve damage to boot. Just realize that you're punching a half-inch hole into his arm (you can look at your own to see what you'd clip if you did that), and--assuming it's a penetrating rather than grazing shot--a larger hole coming out. That's going to tear muscles (or put holes in them) which generally requires surgery to heal properly, remove large patches of flesh, and cause a lot of shockwave trauma in what's called a temporary wound cavity.

I wouldn't plan on him using it any time soon.
 

cornetto

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
111
Reaction score
17
Location
South Dakota
I've butchered a LOT of deer over the years. The meat (muscle) surrounding entry and exit wounds is not usable except as cat food (if there are no metal fragments). Entry wounds aren't as bad, but everything around the exit wound (for several inches) turns to mush, like it's been pureed.

If the slug expanded upon exit, he could have a 2 in or better exit hole surrounded by macerated muscles, tendons, ligaments...there would be substanial tissue loss (like the deer). With damage to the brachial artery, he would also have damage to the median nerve, which would be generally bad news. You definitely want to research that, because the severity of the nerve damge impacts functionality of the arm and hand. He would probably regain the use of that arm eventually, but nowhere near 100%. In this scenario, he'd be on the DL for 6 months to a year.

If the slug goes straight through, the tissue damage isn't so bad, but you still have to address damage to the median nerve.
 

Dandroid

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
350
Reaction score
24
Location
Canada
there is also a risk of sepsis due to the junk brought in with the cavitation wave... where exactly is the shot?...it would be real deforming...
 

hammerklavier

It was a dark and stormy night
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
711
Reaction score
85
Location
NC
In response to cornetto, the hydrostaic damage from a .45 is minimal compared to a rifle. Although if you were talking about deer taken by a handgun, I apologize in advance.

A broken bone would be a nice change to all these flesh wounds protagonists always walk away from.
 

thethinker42

Abnormal Romance Author
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
20,759
Reaction score
2,707
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Website
www.gallagherwitt.com
I would give him a broken bone, but it's established in the prequel that it was a clean through-and-through. Initially, the wound doesn't look that bad, which leads a paramedic to, when triaging the scene, treat another victim first. So, I can't change that part. Though, could it still damage/break the bone on its way through? (Jeez, you'd think I know nothing about guns from all these questions...lol...I'm an experienced shooter, just not when it comes to shooting live critters/people lol)