I'm running into this a lot and I'm awfully confused. There seems to be a hard-limit in terms of word count for many publishers and I don't understand why. For space opera sci-fi I can see the need for a high word count, but lots of great sci-fi books are considered novels at 60,000+ words. Just taking a few from my shelf:
A Scanner Darkly by Philip K. Dick - 220 pages ~55,000 words
Neuromancer by William Gibson - 271 pages ~ 67,750 words
Blood Music by Greg Bear - 246 pages ~ 61,500 words
So what's the deal? And please, for the love of god, don't just tell me "it's what the market wants"without backing up your contention with evidence. If there really is a connection between novels with higher word count and sales, show me the numbers. Otherwise, in light of the literally hundreds of excellent sci fi books published that are in the 60k to 75k range in terms of word count, I cannot see a compelling argument for "it's what the market wants" when to my mind the market wants quality stories, and not necessarily long ones.
A Scanner Darkly by Philip K. Dick - 220 pages ~55,000 words
Neuromancer by William Gibson - 271 pages ~ 67,750 words
Blood Music by Greg Bear - 246 pages ~ 61,500 words
So what's the deal? And please, for the love of god, don't just tell me "it's what the market wants"without backing up your contention with evidence. If there really is a connection between novels with higher word count and sales, show me the numbers. Otherwise, in light of the literally hundreds of excellent sci fi books published that are in the 60k to 75k range in terms of word count, I cannot see a compelling argument for "it's what the market wants" when to my mind the market wants quality stories, and not necessarily long ones.