So after reading the first ten pages, what is the agent going to ask for, the next 40?
Since I know my query is good, I'd rather have the agent read the full manuscript. The last time I queried, 75% of the agents who requested pages, wanted to see the full.
Actually, since I'm mainly going through agents who exclusively use email, I don't see why they don't all request the full, since they're going to stop reading whenever they feel like it anyway.
No, the agent is then going to ask for a full.
Your query may be wonderful, but damned few are worth the paper or pixels it takes to send them, and a good first few pages can save a bad query. And if your query isn't getting a very high request rate from top agents, it isn't much good, either.
The other side of the coin is also a time saver. Just as a good first five or ten pages can save a bad query, they can also tell the truth about the novel behind a good query. Just as a good novel can have a bad query, a bad novel can have a good query. Both are frustrating, both are time wasters.
In fact, from the other side of the desk, the good query that leads to a bad novel is considerably more frustrating. Get a great query, then request the novel. only to find horrible writing, is both frustrating and a serious time waster, but it happens
often. Reading the first few sample pages along with the query in the only way to prevent this.
I'm not sure why agents don't ask for the full in e-mail, other than the fact that I sure hate reading anything very long in e-mail, unless the writer formats it through Word so I can open it directly in Word. Most writers don't have a clue how to do this, or can't do it because they have some bargain rate word processor and e-mail system.
Either way, the first few pages or a full, the sooner you get your actual writing in front of an agent or editor, the better off you both are. It's the only way there is to know whether your query is the problem, or whether your actual writing is the problem.