Maybe it's just me, but it seems that e-published books suffer from a higher degree of literary errors.
Sometimes it's just due to the formatting; I recently read a book where the formatting had caused multiple words to lose their spacing, surely unintentional.
Other times I just don't know what to make of it, again, another book I read recently held some strange grammatical inserts, particularly a point where an apostrophe had somehow become three question marks. That, and other numerous errors made me feel like I was reading an uncorrected proof, or at the very least not the final draft.
Are these sort of errors expected to be more common in E-publishing, or have I just hit a rash of poorly published books?
Sometimes it's just due to the formatting; I recently read a book where the formatting had caused multiple words to lose their spacing, surely unintentional.
Other times I just don't know what to make of it, again, another book I read recently held some strange grammatical inserts, particularly a point where an apostrophe had somehow become three question marks. That, and other numerous errors made me feel like I was reading an uncorrected proof, or at the very least not the final draft.
Are these sort of errors expected to be more common in E-publishing, or have I just hit a rash of poorly published books?