• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Nuclear Winter Recovery?

roseangel

Crazy Young Cat Lady
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
510
Reaction score
26
Location
Off in my head.
How long do you think it would take a world to recover from a nuclear winter?
 

roseangel

Crazy Young Cat Lady
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
510
Reaction score
26
Location
Off in my head.
Getting to a point where life is/can be viable/plentiful again?
Clear skies, fertile earth, that sort of thing.
 

Lhun

New kid, be gentle!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
1,956
Reaction score
137
Nuclear winter isn't much different from an ice age caused by something else, and those happen regularly and can last pretty long, but vary greatly. Although a nuclear winter can only last a couple of years (or less) if the dust settles before serious glaciation happens.
 

RainyDayNinja

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
362
Reaction score
56
Location
Oregon
I'm reviving this topic because I had some similar and related questions.

I'm looking for a nuclear disaster on a scale that can eliminate all human life, even those who have holed up in fallout shelters, presumably by starving them out due to the prolonged radioactive contamination and climate change.

If a nuclear apocalypse was that severe, how long would it take before the radiation dissipated to the point that agriculture was sustainable again? What plant and animal life would still remain?
 

zerospark

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
107
Reaction score
7
I'm reviving this topic because I had some similar and related questions.

I'm looking for a nuclear disaster on a scale that can eliminate all human life, even those who have holed up in fallout shelters, presumably by starving them out due to the prolonged radioactive contamination and climate change.

If a nuclear apocalypse was that severe, how long would it take before the radiation dissipated to the point that agriculture was sustainable again? What plant and animal life would still remain?

Wiping out all living humans would pretty much require sterilizing the biosphere. Even worst-case height-of-Cold War projections never had that as an option. Destroying civilization, that's pretty easy. Killing the species isn't.

If that kind of thing happened, you've got much worse to worry about than radiation. As to what would remain, that would depend on what really happened. It wouldn't be a man-made event, in any case - think more like asteroid impact, gamma-ray burst, black hole hitting the sun, angry aliens launching RKVs, things of that nature.
 

defcon6000

Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
5,196
Reaction score
696
Location
My shed
I'm reviving this topic because I had some similar and related questions.

I'm looking for a nuclear disaster on a scale that can eliminate all human life, even those who have holed up in fallout shelters, presumably by starving them out due to the prolonged radioactive contamination and climate change.

If a nuclear apocalypse was that severe, how long would it take before the radiation dissipated to the point that agriculture was sustainable again? What plant and animal life would still remain?
I would think if it killed all human life it would kill all animal life too - their needs aren't too much different than ours. The deep sea stuff might make it, although the deep sea life feeds on scraps from the upper ocean levels, if all the life in the upper ocean levels dies due to radioactive contamination, then that leaves very little for the deep sea dwellers.

Insects also have a better chance to survive thanks to their exoskeleton, but once again we come to food shortage in the later years of nuclear fallout. If their are no new copses, flies have no where to lay their eggs. No new flies means spiders have nothing to catch in the webs. And then if it's a herbivore insect, the soil will be sterile for awhile so no new plants to munch on. I've heard some insects (some frogs too) can hibernate, although I'm not sure how long they can hibernate before they finally need to eat something. A few years probably won't cut it. And even when they come out of hibernation, if there's nothing to eat they'll still die.

As for plants, not sure. If the sun is blocked out, all life will depend on those seeds that make it, which would then depend on the expiration date on the seeds (no go if they expire before the sun comes out). Plus, the soil will be radioactive. The closer to ground zero, the worse off the soil will be.

The best survivors will be bacterium capable of forming cyst-like shells around themselves, like Anthrax - that stuff can last for ages.

ETA: I think your best bet, if you just wanna kill off humanity, is to have a biological disease that only targets humans and is highly contagious and deadly. Then gather up the survivors from that disaster and drop a nuke on them. :evil
 
Last edited:

Ferret

Dook!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Messages
733
Reaction score
98
Look up information on Chernobyl and Hiroshima to get an idea of nuclear aftermath.