Despicable Me is aggregating a pretty decent score over at RT, and besides Shrek Forever After, I can't think of a recent animated film that has really been terrible. In fact, they've been quite good. Things like How to Train Your Dragon, Coraline, Fantastic Mr. Fox and Kung Fu Panda all came out of non-Pixar animation studios, and I can't help but wonder if they've been closely studying Pixar's work to understand why they are so successful.
Either way, I definitely like this uphill trend in animation.
I'd think they'd have to be idiots not to pay attention to Pixar.
Even when people say an animated feature was bad (Shrek sequels seem to get a lot of flack). A bad animated feature is no where near as bad as a bad live action feature.
Its just that when all the animation is great, then an okay feature looks like a turd when standing next to what Pixar has done.
Overall, Pixar has raised the bar. The viewing public has gotten acclimated to quality animation and so if you are making an animated feature, you better bring your A-game.
As oppossed to live action features, where the public is accustomed to eating the cinematic equivalent of dog food.
The last component is that Animated features just have to be well written. They don't get the lift from big named actors that live action features get. Truth be told, I really don't care who does the voices. It doesn't register to me in the same way that it does for live action. I've never once thought "Wow, i'm going to see that animation because
so and so is doing the voice."
Add all those reasons up, and animation just has to be better than live action IMO. In fact, I think there have been several animations that should have won best picture.
Mel...