- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 6,326
- Reaction score
- 855
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2010/jun/19/newlyweds-want-answers-for-arrest/
The story as written doesn't lend itself to quoting, but here's the gist:
- A nurse, who is also an amputee cancer survivor with a heart condition, showed signs of having a stroke
- Her husband, also a medical professional and former Army medic rushes her to the hospital
- Police give chase because he ran 2 red lights
- Stories differ on who did what when confronted at the hospital
- The husband avoids the officer to carry his wife in, and relates some of her symptoms and history to the hospital staff
- The officer threatens to arrest the man, but doesn't
- Husband presents himself to the police at a later time, but they have no warrants for him
- Days later, he is arrested at the hospital for a variety of charges, including: assault on police, disorderly conduct, reckless endangerment, felony evading arrest, registration expired and two counts of traffic signals violation
- He is then suspended from his job for felony offenses, even though he has not been convicted
Now, I can see how this looks to both sides, but wouldn't one want to err on the side of rational action? This was not a joyriding bunch of kids, or a meth lab in a school zone, but a citizen who was trying to prevent further harm to his wife that a delay in treatment might induce.
Much like our prior thread on a cop punching a girl, a lawful request by and officer should be followed. But what if said officer is unaware of (or uninterested in) mitigating circumstances?
Should this man get leniency in his sentencing? Should the charges be thrown out entirely (a la justifiable homicide)? Should he sue the police for lost wages?
Is this an overreaction by law enforcement? Are the police operating under some illusion of infallibility? Does a longer list of charges somehow make the officer more right?
Should all of us think twice about caring for our loved ones in favor of obeying every law to the letter?
The story as written doesn't lend itself to quoting, but here's the gist:
- A nurse, who is also an amputee cancer survivor with a heart condition, showed signs of having a stroke
- Her husband, also a medical professional and former Army medic rushes her to the hospital
- Police give chase because he ran 2 red lights
- Stories differ on who did what when confronted at the hospital
- The husband avoids the officer to carry his wife in, and relates some of her symptoms and history to the hospital staff
- The officer threatens to arrest the man, but doesn't
- Husband presents himself to the police at a later time, but they have no warrants for him
- Days later, he is arrested at the hospital for a variety of charges, including: assault on police, disorderly conduct, reckless endangerment, felony evading arrest, registration expired and two counts of traffic signals violation
- He is then suspended from his job for felony offenses, even though he has not been convicted
Now, I can see how this looks to both sides, but wouldn't one want to err on the side of rational action? This was not a joyriding bunch of kids, or a meth lab in a school zone, but a citizen who was trying to prevent further harm to his wife that a delay in treatment might induce.
Much like our prior thread on a cop punching a girl, a lawful request by and officer should be followed. But what if said officer is unaware of (or uninterested in) mitigating circumstances?
Should this man get leniency in his sentencing? Should the charges be thrown out entirely (a la justifiable homicide)? Should he sue the police for lost wages?
Is this an overreaction by law enforcement? Are the police operating under some illusion of infallibility? Does a longer list of charges somehow make the officer more right?
Should all of us think twice about caring for our loved ones in favor of obeying every law to the letter?