I don't know anyone who didn't like Dan Brown's books solely because of the writing. They bash the plot, the characters, the research and the ridiculous 'puzzles' much more than they bash the writing.Dan Brown, Stephanie Meyer, Robert James Waller [...] are mediocre, at best, where the how is concerned, but they have the what down pat, and that makes for bestselling novels.
Let's not confuse grammar and style. Grammar is "real" rules; the mechanics of a language. You do it wrong, you look stupid and you're often difficult to understand. Confusing your and you're is a question of grammar. Grammar is like sewing properly: if you don't do it right, your shirt falls apart.It's interesting that Bradbury is mentioned here multiple times as a grammar go-to, despite the way his style rejects all the silly conventional "rules" constantly mentioned as industry preferences.
Exclamation points a plenty, among various other things a writer trained in modern sparsity might cringe at. Yet it's beautiful, no? The point is don't look to authors to learn grammar. Look to them for the brilliance of great storytelling.
Let's not confuse grammar and style. Grammar is "real" rules; the mechanics of a language. You do it wrong, you look stupid and you're often difficult to understand. Confusing your and you're is a question of grammar. Grammar is like sewing properly: if you don't do it right, your shirt falls apart.
How often you use exclamation marks, adverbs, metaphors, and such is style. "Rules" in that context are more about what is currently accepted, much like rules about what is or isn't an acceptable hemline length.
There is little real discussion about grammar, because it's pretty straightforward. If you check the grammar forum, it's mostly about punctuation, or people asking simple questions that they could have looked up in a grammar book. There is almost no room for personal discretion.
Style, on the other hand, is all about personal discretion. Just like clothing fashion, there's a lot of room for variation, but there are some things that are so out of favour you just can't get away with them and hope to be published.
I think George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four is a excellent example of correct and concise English, used to produce a powerful and complex book.
And the point was made upthread that the grammar part of the question didn't make much sense.I thought the question was asking about the kinds of grammar choices authors make (which I would define as style).
Any published author uses proper grammar. So if that's the question, the answer is read any traditionally published author.
a. The system of inflections, syntax, and word formation of a language.
b. The system of rules implicit in a language, viewed as a mechanism for generating all sentences possible in that language.
... my goal has always been to write poorly. So the authors I admire are those who write poorly and exhibit a horrible writing technique, by design.