Is it possible to...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Simran

Is it possible for someone to take a character from a book and rewrite the story from that character's point of view? What copyright laws apply to this? What if the book was written in another country from 1908-1921?


thank you
 

Torgo

Formerly Phantom of Krankor.
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
7,632
Reaction score
1,204
Location
London, UK
Website
torgoblog.blogspot.com
If it's still in copyright, you'd need to get the permission of the copyright holder to produce a derivative work. The term of copyright is something like the lifetime of the author + 75 years (I can't quite remember the exact law - you could do some googling or ask someone better qualified than me; Jaws on this board seems to be the person.) You'd probably find that the book you're talking about is still in copyright, I'm afraid.

Copyright laws do differ between countries but the US laws are the best rule of thumb. They're the least accommodating I know of, especially since the recent Disney-backed amendment.
 

MadScientistMatt

Empirical Storm Trooper
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,692
Reaction score
252
Location
near Atlanta, Georgia
Website
madscientistmatt.blogspot.com
There was a recent book in the news where they did something similar. The Wind Done Gone is a book that came out recently telling the story from Gone With the Wind from a very different point of view. There was something of a legal battle over that one as it seems the author didn't get permission. I can't recall how it was settled, but the book is still in print.
 

AprilBoo

Good to be back
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
221
Reaction score
24
This was done with the novel Lolita - an Italian writer re-told the events of the story from Lolita's point of view. The author and the Nabokov's estate had a big falling out over it. If I remember correctly, the book was published in several European countries without copyright permission being obtained, but when it was to be published in English the author finally asked for the rights. They were granted, but begrudingly, because Nabokov's son took it as an insult that the project had gone forward without the estate's consent in the first place. The estate had apparently granted rights to use characters before.

Your safest bet is to secure copyright permission, if not for the legal reasons, just as a courtesy to the author.
 

Simran

Thank you all for your helpful replies to my question. What if the author is no longer alive? How do you find out who owns the copyright then?
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
Book

If the book in question is still under copyright, you can only do this if you parady the original book. This is how "The Wind Done Gone" was allowed to be published.

If the book is in the public domain, you can do pretty much anything you want, in any way you want.
 

Torgo

Formerly Phantom of Krankor.
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
7,632
Reaction score
1,204
Location
London, UK
Website
torgoblog.blogspot.com
If they've been dead for less than seventy years or so, it's probably still owned by their Estate. You could contact their publisher (who would certainly know) or the Society of Authors. If the book is out of copyright, you're probably OK. The thing is, you must ask an expert - i.e. a lawyer who deals with IP - to be sure.
Tracking down copyright holders can sometimes be tricky, which is why you sometimes see those disclaimers on the copyright page saying 'we tried, but couldn't find the holder'.
 

smallthunder

Ruled by Dachshunds
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
668
Reaction score
60
Location
New to Portland, OREGON
The Principle of Fair Use

Jamesaritchie said:
If the book in question is still under copyright, you can only do this if you parady the original book. This is how "The Wind Done Gone" was allowed to be published.

If the book is in the public domain, you can do pretty much anything you want, in any way you want.

Permit me to elaborate a bit on Jamesaritchie's comment ...

Many people mistakely believe that U.S. copyright protection is the first and last word -- not so, for the principle of Fair Use trumps copyright -- if certain conditions are met.

Fair Use provisions -- the compromise between providing an incentive for people to create things (i.e. to profit from their creations via copyrights/patents/etc) and providing for the advancement of society through the free flow of information.

So, for example, a critic generally cannot be successfully sued for copyright violation for quoting the book (etc) he or she is critiquing. A comedian generally cannot be successfully sued for copyright violation for using the melody of a song when he or she re-write the lyrics for a political satire show.

I am qualifying my comments with the word "generally" because only a court can determine if a specific case satisfies the conditions of Fair Use. For example -- Did the accused financially profit at the plaintiff's expense? Was the accused using the copyrighted material for educational purposes? journalistic purposes? Did the accused use only as much of the copyrighted material as necessary (minimum possible)? etc etc

So, yes, "The Wind Done Gone" was successfully defended against charges of copyright infringement in court based on the Fair Use provisions regarding parody.
 

Simran

Thank you all again for your quick and helpful replies. Well, I found out that it's only been 63 years since the author's death and the only son has since died as well. So, back to the drawing board to find out whom to go to next. :Shrug:
 

AprilBoo

Good to be back
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
221
Reaction score
24
I'm not sure, but my guess would be a grandchild - if the rights became the son's property when the author died as part of the estate, they would become the grandson's property when the son died.

I could be completely wrong about that though.
 

Simran

AprilBoo said:
I'm not sure, but my guess would be a grandchild - if the rights became the son's property when the author died as part of the estate, they would become the grandson's property when the son died.

I could be completely wrong about that though.

Thanks April. With a little research I found a contact person who handles the questions about the public domain of the author's works and so forth. Hopefully we'll get a positive answer. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.