Do you process words faster than images?

KCathy

Writer when I grow up
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
471
Reaction score
110
Location
Oregon Coast
Website
www.catherinebusinelle.com
When I flip through channels on the remote, I have to take a couple of seconds on each to be able to interpret what I'm seeing (1, 2, soap opera, 1, 2, Godfather III, 1, 2, ShamWow, 1, 2, Sleep Number bed, 1, 2, Monk rerun). My husband can fly through them without taking his finger off the remote.

Since last week, when my toddler cleverly hid the remote somewhere, I have to flip through 39 channels to get from Disney to the channel that shows the VCR output. I go through them so quickly that I have no idea what I'm looking at. When I flipped past a commercial for a TV movie, however, I was easily able to READ "Nora Roberts Midnight Bayou" in the split-second before the channel changed.

It got me thinking about how I don't "see" characters in books unless I see a movie based on the book first. I can remember that they're pale or redheads, but I don't see a pale redhead--just the words themselves. Maybe that's why I skip long descriptions. I don't want to work to imagine what I'm supposed to be seeing.

Is this a usual thing for people who like to work with words? Do you "see" images from what you're reading and writing, or just process them in words?
 

Pagey's_Girl

Still plays with dolls
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
1,725
Reaction score
958
Location
New York (not the city)
I'm the other way around - I see the scene playing out in my mind and then have to try to get it down in words. I have these very vivid pictures in my head of the characters, the settings, the pattern of the carpet on the floor (if there is a carpet at all.) I'm still learning to be selective about how much I describe.
 
Last edited:

Phoebe H

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
587
Reaction score
117
Location
Seattle-ish
Website
ph-unbalanced.livejournal.com
I'm *extremely* non-visual. I process words much better than pictures, and they are converted to voices when I do.

Someone asked me once if I dreamed in color or black and white, and it took me a while to realize that I do neither -- I dream in sounds. Mostly. My dreams are a lot like those Ken Burns documentaries, where you've got the still picture with narration behind it. The picture gives context, but all the sizzle is in the sound.

And yeah, that ends up making visual descriptions really hard to do. But on the other hand, my dialogue rocks.
 

Clair Dickson

A dark core to every cloud
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
2,557
Reaction score
571
Location
SE Michigan
Website
www.bofexler.blogspot.com
I process words best. I think in sentences, rarely in images. When I'm imaging a scene, I kind of narrate it (but not a conscious thing) often times, right down to the lanague I would like to use.

I tend to put words to just about everything.

As for the TV, I find that now that I've grown used to the on-screen channel guide, I don't pay much attention to the images. I just read what it is and decide from that.
 

StephanieFox

Maybull the Bulldog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
4,442
Reaction score
636
Location
MPLS
I'm a word person, not a picture person. I'm also kinetic, so I tend to sense things with my body – my body placement within an environment is how I find my way around there. Second is sound. I think I find smell more important than pure pictures.

I went to a meditation class where the instructor wanted us to 'visualize', something I find difficult. I asked her about working through other senses and a bunch of people from the class chimed in trying to 'fix' me. Telling them that there was nothing wrong with me, I just processed the world a little differently, did no good. They went on for about 20 minutes wasting my time so I could become a visual, just like them.

Feh.

When I write, it's all about sound; I tell a story. The rhythm is also very important. Another writer mocked me about this, but it didn't bother me because I'm a better writer than she is. Ha! Ha! I think a log of writers are not visualizers.
 
Last edited:

semilargeintestine

BassGirl 5000
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
4,763
Reaction score
1,034
Picture person, definitely. I always have pictures/movies and music running through my head.
 

Cranky

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
14,945
Reaction score
8,145
I'm with the fish on this one. :) I see things in my head as pictures...even when I see words, I visualize them on a page, as actual physical words written in my handwriting or whatever font it was written in.

Kind of weird, I suppose.
 

Gehanna

Introvert
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
2,139
Reaction score
429
If the words are written then no, I do not process them faster than images. I am highly auditory. Sound is very important to me.

Sincerely,
Gehanna
 

Phoebe H

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
587
Reaction score
117
Location
Seattle-ish
Website
ph-unbalanced.livejournal.com
I'm a word person, not a picture person. I'm also kinetic, so I tend to sense things with my body – my body placement within an environment is how I find my way around there.

Yes, exactly. I can walk through a dark room without stepping on anything that's been scattered on the floor. I just know where everything is and avoid it.

My desk looks like an absolute disaster -- but I can find any piece of paper I need with my eyes closed, by it's position from where I sit. But every time I clean my desk up I'm hunting for things for weeks.
 

Beach Bunny

The Provocative One
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
3,146
Reaction score
2,971
Location
Where angels fear to tread
It's like I have videotape running in my head. When I took tests back in high school, I would "replay" the lecture the teacher gave which had the answers to the questions. :Shrug:
 

Shadow_Ferret

Court Jester
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
23,708
Reaction score
10,657
Location
In a world of my own making
Website
shadowferret.wordpress.com
It got me thinking about how I don't "see" characters in books unless I see a movie based on the book first. I can remember that they're pale or redheads, but I don't see a pale redhead--just the words themselves. Maybe that's why I skip long descriptions. I don't want to work to imagine what I'm supposed to be seeing.

Is this a usual thing for people who like to work with words? Do you "see" images from what you're reading and writing, or just process them in words?
When I read, I see the whole thing play out in my head. I can see the characters, the settings, everything. So much so that movies based on books always disappoint because they look nothing like the wonderful characters I dreamed up.