Standards in this genre?

Status
Not open for further replies.

reph

Fig of authority
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
971
Location
On a fig tree, presumably
Will it hurt sales of a romance novel if the book has the following features that are undesirable in fiction generally?

- Frequent saidbookisms and enhancement of speech tags with adverbs.

- Verbs denoting bodily movement used as speech tags, like this:
"Welcome to our home," John smiled.
"I don't know," Maggie shrugged.

- Long descriptions of a character's looks that aren't relevant to the narrative at that point.

- Long, introspective reminiscences, presented as thoughts, in which an adult character recalls his or her childhood, usually pleasant scenes from it. These lack tension and don't move the story along. They seem to be there as a way of introducing the character.

- Lack of attention to POV; much headhopping.

- Much telling; little showing.

I ask because I need to advise someone about a book, and I'm not familiar enough with this genre.
 

Susan Gable

Dreamer of dreams, teller of tales
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,110
Reaction score
755
Location
Pennsylvania
Website
www.susangable.com
reph said:
Will it hurt sales of a romance novel if the book has the following features that are undesirable in fiction generally?

- Frequent saidbookisms and enhancement of speech tags with adverbs.

- Verbs denoting bodily movement used as speech tags, like this:
"Welcome to our home," John smiled.
"I don't know," Maggie shrugged.

- Long descriptions of a character's looks that aren't relevant to the narrative at that point.

- Long, introspective reminiscences, presented as thoughts, in which an adult character recalls his or her childhood, usually pleasant scenes from it. These lack tension and don't move the story along. They seem to be there as a way of introducing the character.

- Lack of attention to POV; much headhopping.

- Much telling; little showing.

I ask because I need to advise someone about a book, and I'm not familiar enough with this genre.

Reph, good writing is good writing. What you've described is not good writing. Editors of romance expect strong, good writing. Head-hopping is a definate no-no these days. Long, dull passages, whether introspection or description are no-nos. Too much telling, ditto.

Now, what used to be done is a whole 'nother thing. And what the well-established authors can do is also a whole 'nother thing. But if you're asking about a manuscript that hasn't sold to an editor yet - that manuscript is in trouble.

Susan G.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,934
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
It would be damaging, yes. Romance readers may be looking for a certain positive and familiar experiences, but they are at least as selective as other readers when it comes to the basics of writing a narrative.
 

reph

Fig of authority
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
971
Location
On a fig tree, presumably
I hoped for an answer that would get everyone off the hook, like "Well, there is this one subgenre where telling instead of showing is okay." I didn't expect that kind of answer, though. Thanks for your opinions. They will very likely influence the course of the project.
 

reph

Fig of authority
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
971
Location
On a fig tree, presumably
Outcome

The publisher has now withdrawn the book from production in order to correct its faults.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.