The difference between BIG agencies and SMALL agencies?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rune100

Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
I'm sorry for asking yet another question of ineptitude, but there it is.

What is the difference between BIG agencies and SMALL agencies? More advance? More personalized treatment? More people to wait in line behind? More experience at your fingertips?

I'm facing a very difficult decision this weekend that involves just this very question and this place is so full of knowledge I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask.

Thank you all very much.

RUNE
 

oneidii

Copyediting Queen
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
329
Reaction score
143
Location
Berlin, baby.
Website
www.jenkblom.com
Hm, I can't help you much, but you might think about asking in the Purgatory thread. Someone there might be able to help you.
 

ChaosTitan

Around
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
15,463
Reaction score
2,886
Location
The not-so-distant future
Website
kellymeding.com
Both have their perks, and both have their faults.

Big agencies tend to come with more combined experience, more sway with some houses, the prestige that comes with their name, larger support staff within in the agency (such as in-house co-agents for film/foreign rights). Big agencies also come with larger client lists, so as a new author, you're a tiny fish in a huge pond. Agents may be busier with said larger client lists, so response time could be slower.

I'm repped by a small, one-man agency, and I love it. His client list is small, but growing. I've never gone longer than a day waiting for an email response. He knows editors, he knows books, and he listens. So far, it's been a great match.
 

euclid

Where did I put me specs?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
1,964
Reaction score
229
Location
Paradise
Website
www.jjtoner.com
Consider also, the age of the agency. There is one large agency in London that was founded in 2008 - the result of a supernova in another large agency, I think. A young agency might not have the experience needed to do a good job for you.
 

ChaosTitan

Around
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
15,463
Reaction score
2,886
Location
The not-so-distant future
Website
kellymeding.com
Consider also, the age of the agency. There is one large agency in London that was founded in 2008 - the result of a supernova in another large agency, I think. A young agency might not have the experience needed to do a good job for you.

A young agency with experienced agents, though, may. For example, Jenny Rappaport recently split with the L. Perkins Agency and formed her own boutique agency. The Rapport Agency may be only a few months old, but the founder has years of experience and contacts.
 

MsJudy

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
5,673
Reaction score
1,440
Location
california
It also depends on the structure within the agency. For example, some of the large agencies work as a loose conglomeration of free agents. If one rejects you, you can query others. If one reps you, there's a chance none of the others will ever even know your name. Other agencies work very closely together. If one rejects you, they all reject you. The agents talk together on a regular basis, so if you get repped by one, you benefit from the expertise of all of them. And in some agencies, it's sort of a mix of the two styles. Experienced agents mentor newer agents, so you do benefit from the wisdom of the longer history.

And in some cases, a long history is not an advantage. The publishing world has changed a lot in the last two decades. The current economic climate isn't going to help matters any. So someone young, new, enthusiastic, hip to new technology, may be a better advocate, depending on your book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.