Now that the elections are over, how about something a little lighter?
(I think this fits in P&CE, as you'll see if you read on. If not, will a mod please relocate appropriately?)
This article in Reason Online discusses Tor Books, referred to as 'the most successful science fiction publisher in the world.' Then they go on to back that up with a few facts, as well as noting their current position in the battle for the Prometheus Award.
Finally, my question to the forum.
Have particular science fiction books had an impact on your political beliefs?
My personal list is long, but at the top would be Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and in particular the "Jeffersonian Rational Anarchist" Professor Bernardo de la Paz.
(I think this fits in P&CE, as you'll see if you read on. If not, will a mod please relocate appropriately?)
This article in Reason Online discusses Tor Books, referred to as 'the most successful science fiction publisher in the world.' Then they go on to back that up with a few facts, as well as noting their current position in the battle for the Prometheus Award.
As befits Reason, they explore the relationship between science fiction and libertarianismTor publishes between 110 and 120 new original titles each year, routinely topping the science fiction bestseller list compiled by the industry magazine Locus. For 20 years running, it also has won the highly respected Locus Award for the best science fiction publishing house. This year Tor earned yet another distinction when its authors claimed all five finalist spots for the Prometheus Award, the annual prize for best science fiction novel of the year handed out by the Libertarian Futurist Society.
They go on to discuss the impact of libertarian science fiction on the current political scene, including works by such notables as Cory Doctorow, Harry Turtledove, Poul Anderson, J. Neil Schulman, and Robert A. Heinlein.Science fiction has long served as a kind of mad scientist’s basement lab for testing out different political,economic, and social arrangements. Tor’s success suggests that science fiction’s commitment to meditations on the importance of human freedom remains strong, as mainstream writers borrow more freely from the once-ghettoized genre, indulging in science fiction–style hypotheticals that probe both the outer limits of and existential threats to liberty.
“Libertarianism is very much part of the intellectual argument of science fiction,” says longtime Tor editor Patrick Nielsen Hayden. “It’s impossible to be a part of the argument of science fiction without engaging both broad libertarian ideas and also specifically the whole American free market intellectual tradition.”
Writers with a jumble of competing views, working with editors spanning the political spectrum, churn out books for the mass market that turn out to be surprisingly effective propaganda pieces for liberty and against government.
Scratch a civil libertarian, and you’ll often find a 15-year-old who read a lot of Philip K. Dick. Ask a college guy protesting censorship at his student newspaper for his inspirations, and there’s a good chance Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 will come up. Meet someone who thinks there might be an upside to anarchy, and you have probably found a girl who once read Ursula K. LeGuin’s The Dispossessed or a boy who loved Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash.
Finally, my question to the forum.
Have particular science fiction books had an impact on your political beliefs?
My personal list is long, but at the top would be Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and in particular the "Jeffersonian Rational Anarchist" Professor Bernardo de la Paz.