- Joined
- Oct 28, 2008
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 35
Hey all,
I've been doing the internet writing group thing for nearly a decade and I find that no matter how nice I try to be, or how vague I try to be, there will always be someone at some point who throws a fit about this.
But here's my dilemma:
The new author is getting bad information. As an example, the critiquer suggested a sentence structure to correct passive voice--with a dangling participle. Or say the critiquer is advising the new writer to start the story with an info-dump prologue.
In the past I've created new threads about how to share backstory correctly or fix dangling participles, but sometimes that's not always an option--though it's my preferred option.
Sometimes I've offered my thoughts without ever once referencing the other critique--as a sort of way to show two opinions and then *hope* that the new writer chooses the correct one.
In the end, however, when I don't address (even privately) the mistaken information directly--the critiquer continues to offer the same bad advice.
Which then makes me think it's unfair to the critiquer to let them continue thinking the information is correct, when it isn't. I mean, if someone reading my posts noticed I never usedspacestoseparatemywords and I couldn't figure out why no one wanted to 'talk' to me, I'd be grateful if someone helped me write better.
But not everyone is. So, that's my question:
Is it EVER okay to correct a critique?
I've been doing the internet writing group thing for nearly a decade and I find that no matter how nice I try to be, or how vague I try to be, there will always be someone at some point who throws a fit about this.
But here's my dilemma:
The new author is getting bad information. As an example, the critiquer suggested a sentence structure to correct passive voice--with a dangling participle. Or say the critiquer is advising the new writer to start the story with an info-dump prologue.
In the past I've created new threads about how to share backstory correctly or fix dangling participles, but sometimes that's not always an option--though it's my preferred option.
Sometimes I've offered my thoughts without ever once referencing the other critique--as a sort of way to show two opinions and then *hope* that the new writer chooses the correct one.
In the end, however, when I don't address (even privately) the mistaken information directly--the critiquer continues to offer the same bad advice.
Which then makes me think it's unfair to the critiquer to let them continue thinking the information is correct, when it isn't. I mean, if someone reading my posts noticed I never usedspacestoseparatemywords and I couldn't figure out why no one wanted to 'talk' to me, I'd be grateful if someone helped me write better.
But not everyone is. So, that's my question:
Is it EVER okay to correct a critique?