Quality vs Speed

Status
Not open for further replies.

popmuze

Last of a Dying Breed
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
2,597
Reaction score
181
Location
Nowhere, man
A while back I was put into a situation where I was given six months to write an entire non-fiction 90,00 word book. Since I have a lot of the materials on hand, in the form of past interviews and a library of source material, and with the judicious and lightning fast use of the Internet, about 20 phone interviews and writing six to ten hours a day, I'm up to 75,000 words in less than two months. I've even re-read most of these pages and they actually make sense, conform to my proposal, and flow nicely.

The only problem occurs whenever I entertain basic doubts that anyone could possible take seriously a book written so quickly (not that an outsider would necessarily know how fast I did this).

Can anyone offer me philosophical insight as to whether the length of time it takes to complete a book has anything to do with the quality of the book?
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
For non-fiction I wouldn't think time and quality are necessarily connected.

To my mind the deciding factor for both elements would be the ability to express oneself and the depth of knowledge in the subject matter.
 

Bubastes

bananaed
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 7, 2006
Messages
7,394
Reaction score
2,250
Website
www.gracewen.com
I don't think there is any correlation between quality and speed. Some people simply write faster and better than others.
 

Michael Davis

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
557
Reaction score
44
Location
SW VA
I try to write the raw draft as quickly as possible to get the ideas and the evolving scenes down while they're fresh in my head. For my first three novels it ranged from 7 weeks to 12 weeks. The kicker is in the reviews. That to me is were the quality in a story matures. It general takes me 2 to 3 months to review my MS before I send to pre submission reviewers. Then some of my best scenes, lines, environmental descriptions come when I revise in line with the reviewers suggestions and I've been away from the story for a month while they read it.
 

Mr. Anonymous

Just a guy with a pen & a delusion
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
2,781
Reaction score
668
My first novel, I wrote pretty quickly. 65,000 words in about three weeks. Considering I only worked about 5 days a week, it comes to around 15 days or so. So just over 4,000 words per day. As a result, the first draft was pretty weak. In fact, I'm kind of ashamed of it. lol.

My next novel, the one I'm working on now, is coming along much slower. 1000 words here, 1000 words there. Gives me a lot more time to think, plan things out. And although I already have a small list of changes that I'm going to have to make, it's looking pretty solid. I'll have to edit/revise, obviously, but I'm feeling a lot more confident about it.

So for me, taking it slow really does help. Although part of it is probably due to how much I learned since I wrote the first one.
 

Dale Emery

is way off topic
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
1,429
Reaction score
311
Location
Sacramento CA
Website
dalehartleyemery.com
The only problem occurs whenever I entertain basic doubts that anyone could possible take seriously a book written so quickly (not that an outsider would necessarily know how fast I did this).

Can anyone offer me philosophical insight as to whether the length of time it takes to complete a book has anything to do with the quality of the book?

Yes: You didn't write the book quickly. You wrote down the book quickly. It took you years to write it.

Dale
 

Chasing the Horizon

Blowing in the Wind
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
4,288
Reaction score
561
Location
Pennsylvania
6 months to write a 90k book really doesn't sound that fast to me (it's certainly not slow, but not unreasonable either). I started my YA novel the beginning of July, and expect to have it completed and edited by the middle of October, so that's only 3.5 months and I've been working on several other projects at the same time. I understand non-fiction may be more time-consuming because of all the research, but it sounds like you had a good bit of that done before you started. I don't see why the quality of your work would suffer because of the deadline.
 

DamaNegra

Mexican on the loose!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
6,260
Reaction score
1,358
Location
Scotland
Website
www.fictionpress.com
Not slow at all. Especially because you already had most of the information in hand, which is the hard and lengthy part of non-fiction. If your book makes sense and is based on solid facts and research, who cares how long it took you to write it?
 

tehuti88

Mackinac Island Fanatic
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 12, 2008
Messages
1,487
Reaction score
149
Location
Not here anymore
Website
www.inkspot.com
I wrote an approximately 70,000-word novel in about 2-3 months once. (Granted, this is not taking into account research and outlining, and I can't say if it's any good.)

Something written fast isn't necessarily bad. Every situation is unique. I bet some stories that people spend forever working on really suck.
 

popmuze

Last of a Dying Breed
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
2,597
Reaction score
181
Location
Nowhere, man
To me the most amazing thing is how research has changed because of the internet. If I need to know the menu for the first Thanksgiving, zap, I have in two second. Best of all, no microfilm.
 

JamieFord

giving resonant directions
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
275
Location
On Cloud 9
Website
www.jamieford.com
That doesn't sound too fast at all, honestly--it sounds about right. I've read some awful books that took 7+ years to write...
 

Snowstorm

Baby plot bunneh sniffs out a clue
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
13,722
Reaction score
1,121
Location
Wyoming mountain cabin
Popmuze, you wrote you had most of the material already. That's probably a huge opportunity of having such a project finished. If you already knew the material, you're even closer. Plus, it sounds like you're working very hard on it so I don't think you're rushing it.
 

scheherazade

Human
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
300
Reaction score
25
Location
Toronto
I think Stephen King has said he takes about 3-6 months to write a first draft, and most of his books are more than 90,000 words. Yes, you might be able to write nicer sentences if you worked slower, but not necessarily. My bet would be that working faster is probably more likely to help the flow of your story.

The reader won't know how long it took you to write your story (unless they're a fan desperately waiting for the next book!). As long as it's edited well. So just go with it. If the story's flowing, don't argue!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.