*apologizes for my poor impression of Clint Eastwood*
I've hit an impasse in my consideration of the subject of atheism/agnosticism vs. a benevolent higher power. All my conclusions lead me to believe that there isn't any benevolent guidance for the animals called Human (or malevolent, for that matter) except for the area known as Luck (Good and Bad) where it gets a little gray for me.
Is Luck (both Good and Bad) always a function of coincidence? Or perhaps coincidence married to unseen consequence? Or maybe a combination of consequence, coincidence and unseen guidance? Can my non-believing character rely on luck to get him through?
I've hit an impasse in my consideration of the subject of atheism/agnosticism vs. a benevolent higher power. All my conclusions lead me to believe that there isn't any benevolent guidance for the animals called Human (or malevolent, for that matter) except for the area known as Luck (Good and Bad) where it gets a little gray for me.
Is Luck (both Good and Bad) always a function of coincidence? Or perhaps coincidence married to unseen consequence? Or maybe a combination of consequence, coincidence and unseen guidance? Can my non-believing character rely on luck to get him through?