What is the relationship between the perceiver (the reader) and the perceived (the novel) and perhaps of what exactly is the perceiver (i.e., does the transcendental ego of the reader dissipate in the act of reading)?
I should start by comparing the novel (or any text for that matter) to the world-of-being insofar as it is an object in the world presumably before it can possibly be read. For the purposes of this discussion, let's assume that the text is not created (or that the matter of its creation is irrelevant) and that in the process of reading the novel, it is a world and reality unto itself.
The process of reading a novel is two-fold: real and represented physical experience and intellectual/emotive interaction. The two are inseparable for one could not exist without the other; even in the case of the physical experience of reading the novel, a reader would have to not-read the text to avoid ordering it into some sort of coherent meaning. However, the stance I will present here asserts that the text is not made by meaning but ordered by it; that is, without being read, the text is an unreflected object, much like the world-of-being, but in order to re-discover this unreflected object, it needs to be reflected upon, and is structured to allow such activity.
What this concedes then is not that there was an intention to the text (although there very well could be; but to admit that is to admit that there is for one, a supreme author over the text, and secondly, that this supreme author is itself a transcendental ego, or speaking subject) but that the text, regardless, is open to reflection by way of its ontological structure.
The reader, then, is in a very particular position of being able to view the world-of-being (the text) as a subject, a transcendental ego capable of passing judgment. Is this the case? Is any reader in this position? Or is the world-of-being, the novel, that they are partaking in no longer separable from the consciousness, the reader, so that this is not a question of two entities somehow separate or distinct from, or external to each other, but of the relationships between them that forms from their necessary integration?
This thread hopes to probe not at authorial control by way of intention but authorial and reader relationship by way of the ontological structure of the novel.
I should start by comparing the novel (or any text for that matter) to the world-of-being insofar as it is an object in the world presumably before it can possibly be read. For the purposes of this discussion, let's assume that the text is not created (or that the matter of its creation is irrelevant) and that in the process of reading the novel, it is a world and reality unto itself.
The process of reading a novel is two-fold: real and represented physical experience and intellectual/emotive interaction. The two are inseparable for one could not exist without the other; even in the case of the physical experience of reading the novel, a reader would have to not-read the text to avoid ordering it into some sort of coherent meaning. However, the stance I will present here asserts that the text is not made by meaning but ordered by it; that is, without being read, the text is an unreflected object, much like the world-of-being, but in order to re-discover this unreflected object, it needs to be reflected upon, and is structured to allow such activity.
What this concedes then is not that there was an intention to the text (although there very well could be; but to admit that is to admit that there is for one, a supreme author over the text, and secondly, that this supreme author is itself a transcendental ego, or speaking subject) but that the text, regardless, is open to reflection by way of its ontological structure.
The reader, then, is in a very particular position of being able to view the world-of-being (the text) as a subject, a transcendental ego capable of passing judgment. Is this the case? Is any reader in this position? Or is the world-of-being, the novel, that they are partaking in no longer separable from the consciousness, the reader, so that this is not a question of two entities somehow separate or distinct from, or external to each other, but of the relationships between them that forms from their necessary integration?
This thread hopes to probe not at authorial control by way of intention but authorial and reader relationship by way of the ontological structure of the novel.