I tend to think most drama / thriller series run too long. A great, innovative idea often doesn't lend itself to a long series. I loved the first season of Prison Break, but after they break out then get put into another prison just so the show can live up to its title, it's just ridiculous. A lot of shows could benefit from having a two-three year cap placed on the production schedule. But of course the networks have to milk a program for all of its profitability (not a knock, mind you, as if I was an exec I'd at least be tempted to do the same) which leads to shows overstaying their welcome.
Still, I wonder, if people were aware of a show having a "3-year-plan," would that positively or adversely affect viewership?
Debatable. If there weren't 3 years between seasons, the acclaim and buzz may have been worth it. As it was, interest lagged and never recovered.They also let the Soprano's go at just about the right time.
Still, I wonder, if people were aware of a show having a "3-year-plan," would that positively or adversely affect viewership?
I agree at the moment, however every 3-5 years they reinvent the cast. The format holds nicely when they clean the slate pretty regularly.The only thing coming to mind right now is SNL. They really need to lay it to rest. It's had it's hayday (and I am a huge SNL fan) but it is definately beyond it's prime.
I agree at the moment, however every 3-5 years they reinvent the cast. The format holds nicely when they clean the slate pretty regularly.
This is the lull time between finding the next cast that really gels and has standout talent in most positions.
If only Chris Farley had a less talented brother they could exploit!They haven't had a great cast like that since the Farley, Sandler, and crew cast back in the 90's.
Sure there have been standouts (like Will Ferrel), but the casts have been lacking for a LONG time now.
They haven't had a great cast like that since the Farley, Sandler, and crew cast back in the 90's.