The same poisons do pop up in numerous materials/books but if you started today and wrote a scene containing just one compound from just one of several well-known books you'd likely be writing on that book for decades. Or, you'd have a tech manual instead of a novel.
Posions/firearms/explosives...it's not so much what you use in the story, it's how you use it. One of my "specialites" is improvished explosive devices. I will never accurately describe the methodolgy of manufacture or identify the correct measurements/components. I will, however, mention some of the common elements if the story calls for it.
Most common example of a popular book full of errors is probably the first edition of "Anarchist Cookbook" ...full of recipes for all sorts of nasty compounds and devices, and I would suspect at least a quarter of them, if not more, are in error. Close, but no cigar. (Thankfully)
As a fiction writer who may use that book as a resource, I don't have trouble with the inaccuracies, provided the mistake isn't glaring. RE: someone describes a culture methodology for salmonella when it's actually a process for another well-known pathogen. By the same token, I don 't want to read a passge in which the hero "drops the magazine from a .357 model 66 S&W revolver and fires off another 15 rounds."
Of course, this again begs the question, "How techincal do we really want to be, anyway?"