Murder is the purposefulless taking of another life - and by purposefulless I'm talking about taking life in the commission of a crime, to cover up a crime or just for plain idiotic other reasons. I see value in eating meat as well as self-defense.
There is also purpose in the state enacting justice in that by putting a murderer to death you ensure they never kill again. Which is probably why there are many factors and variables in deciding which cases are death penalty cases.
Though I do believe that the death penalty should be expanded for other crimes (sometimes, careless driving around cyclists is enough
) I don't see it as being morally objectionable or even 'murder' in the above definitions. Sometimes there are people who just need to be taken out of society. A hundred years ago, this was naturally done by their own stupidity, but unfortunately our modern age tends to protect the stupid more than it should.
As for the idea of the death penalty for 'screwing up a child' I wonder about that. I've heard of things done to children that was truly tragic - and yes, the child grew up screwed up, but I also look at the treatment of that child after the original incident and I wonder which was more harmful - the criminal act inflicted or the so called "caring" that happened afterward?
Rabe....