- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 488
- Age
- 44
- Location
- Prague now, Glasgow in November
...Or am I just being crabby this morning? Our university (probably like all the others around here) has recently started a rigorous anti-plagiarism drive, given the rise of these pay-per-essay sites and the likes. All submissions are run through some sort of software / search engine to check you haven't downloaded it and to look for similarities to published things. In order to avoid being accused of plagiarism we're told to cite absolutely everything, and to list books in the bibliography even if we only scanned them briefly.
The guidelines for both the School of Law and the university in general state that any direct reference or quote has to be footnoted to give its source, as does any paraphrase of a published opinion. So if you're like me and paranoid that you'll be failed or marked down because they recognise an argument from a book, everything is footnoted.
Yet - and this is what I find off - they are still including the footnotes in the overall word count?
Now, I can see the need to keep a check on footnotes as they are a cheating way to avoid the word count if you use them to add explanatory notes. If someone has whole paragraphs of writing in the footnotes, then fine, include that in their count. However, when it's just citations, surely they should be encouraging this, rather than penalising? I've just finished a 5,000 word essay, a practice run for the 4th Year dissertation, and I've had to take advantage of the 10% leeway we're given on word counts anyway as the subject was so huge. With the footnotes added, I've got another 500 words to consider. As I said, there is one explanatary one which is less than 10 words long. The rest are all references and citations.
Having called the course convenor this morning, I've managed to negotiate these out of the word count, but it still took a lot of persuading. The guidance notes for the big dissertation, which is 10,000 words, specify that the footnotes are counted. Now, if there are 500 words for a 5,000 word essay... It starts to take a rather large chunk of argument space away.
I'm tempted to actually write to someone, but I have no idea who to address the issue to. It just seems to be completely against the spirit of discouraging plagiarism and encouraging honest attribution. Or am I getting annoyed at nothing here?
(I also apologise if this is the wrong place for this, but since it is a bit of a rant, and not generally writing related, I thought OP a good place to start. Please move it or delete it if this isn't the case).
The guidelines for both the School of Law and the university in general state that any direct reference or quote has to be footnoted to give its source, as does any paraphrase of a published opinion. So if you're like me and paranoid that you'll be failed or marked down because they recognise an argument from a book, everything is footnoted.
Yet - and this is what I find off - they are still including the footnotes in the overall word count?
Now, I can see the need to keep a check on footnotes as they are a cheating way to avoid the word count if you use them to add explanatory notes. If someone has whole paragraphs of writing in the footnotes, then fine, include that in their count. However, when it's just citations, surely they should be encouraging this, rather than penalising? I've just finished a 5,000 word essay, a practice run for the 4th Year dissertation, and I've had to take advantage of the 10% leeway we're given on word counts anyway as the subject was so huge. With the footnotes added, I've got another 500 words to consider. As I said, there is one explanatary one which is less than 10 words long. The rest are all references and citations.
Having called the course convenor this morning, I've managed to negotiate these out of the word count, but it still took a lot of persuading. The guidance notes for the big dissertation, which is 10,000 words, specify that the footnotes are counted. Now, if there are 500 words for a 5,000 word essay... It starts to take a rather large chunk of argument space away.
I'm tempted to actually write to someone, but I have no idea who to address the issue to. It just seems to be completely against the spirit of discouraging plagiarism and encouraging honest attribution. Or am I getting annoyed at nothing here?
(I also apologise if this is the wrong place for this, but since it is a bit of a rant, and not generally writing related, I thought OP a good place to start. Please move it or delete it if this isn't the case).