The author... or his work

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thekherham

The Alien Writer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
552
Reaction score
12
Location
5657 Brežendra Rd., Treskebhar, Te’hănys, Alharhan
I was just reading the thread about the worst book you ever read, and I thought I'd ask this question: If you read a really bad book by a certain author, do you not read whatever other books the author wrote ("If this book is so bad, I'm sure his other work must be pretty crappy, too."), or do you try other works by the same author. ("This book was really bad, but maybe one of his other books will be better.") In other words do you think authors are consistently good, or consistently bad (for the most part)?
 

Perks

delicate #!&@*#! flower
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,000
Reaction score
6,975
Location
At some altitude
Website
www.jamie-mason.com
Good question. In my case with 'Where or When' by Anita Shreve, I waited for a while for the bad taste to fade and then tried another of her books. I know that she's very successful and well-received, but I was right the first time. I find her writing manipulative and irritating.

But that's why they make all flavors...
 

Richard

13th Triskaidekaphobe
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,868
Reaction score
316
Location
England
Website
www.richardcobbett.co.uk
Nope. I've read shockingly bad books from authors I liked, and had nice surprises from ones I thought were truly dire.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
I would rather try a new author than give a second chance to someone who wrote a previous book that was a total waste of my time and money. Typically I find authors books either hold steady or get worse, very rarely better.
 

PattiTheWicked

Unleashing Hell.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
3,999
Reaction score
1,251
Website
www.pattiwigington.com
I've found that when I encounter an author I like, I'll read pretty much everything they've done. When I run across a book that I hate, I don't bother getting another one by the same author. I've occasionally found books I didn't like by authors I normally like, but for the most part, all I ask for is consistency.
 

azbikergirl

I really do look like this.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
886
Reaction score
71
Location
not in AZ anymore...
Website
fantasyauthor.blogspot.com
veinglory said:
Typically I find authors books either hold steady or get worse, very rarely better.
In my experience, many writers get better with experience. If I read an earlier work and find it disappointing, maybe I'll peek at a more recent book to see if he/she has improved.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
I am mainly reading mainstream publishers and by the time and author gets to that level they have generally hit their stride. But if I heard a writer had improved I might try them again. I can't think of a case where I found a bad writer (versus good but not great) had become worth reading with later efforts--but given my habits I guess I wouldn't.
 
Last edited:

SRHowen

Erotica is not a four letter word!
Requiescat In Pace
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,055
Reaction score
349
Location
ON the edge of the insane feral.
I used to read Patricia Cornwell--all of her books, loved them. Then she switched to a very annoying third person present tense, in a book in the series I was reading. I really tried to wade through the book, but couldn't, it was that bad.

When the next book came out, I got it at the library rather than buy it and when I discovered she was using the same POV--I didn't even read past the first pages. Another book in the series has come out--I picked it up at the book store, read page one --same POV, passed it by.

Next book out, I doubt I will even bother to check and see if it is in that POV, I have skipped three books now in the series---

Why she switched POV's and of all things decided to do present tense--I don't know, but I hate it.

Shawn
 

brinkett

Elder Scrolls devotee
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
930
Reaction score
79
azbikergirl said:
In my experience, many writers get better with experience. If I read an earlier work and find it disappointing, maybe I'll peek at a more recent book to see if he/she has improved.
I've had the opposite experience. I find that later books are generally worse than earlier ones, though there are exceptions.
 

GPatten

Dang...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
157
Location
Titusville Florida
Website
forum.m1911.org
The only thing I have to compare a previously good author in the beginning, who began to write chit is Tom Clancy. Once he acquired a ghost, writer partner his works have disappointed me. His novels jumped all over the place where I had to book mark everything so I could refer back. As I am a man, and as I once was in the Navy, I liked his stories.

I read many other authors, but not lately.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
GPatten said:
The only thing I have to compare a previously good author in the beginning, who began to write chit is Tom Clancy. Once he acquired a ghost, writer partner his works have disappointed me. His novels jumped all over the place where I had to book mark everything so I could refer back. As I am a man, and as I once was in the Navy, I liked his stories.

I read many other authors, but not lately.

Clancy has had a writing partner since Red Storm Rising, and I think most of his best books were written that way. As I understand it, Clany writes all his own novels. It's only the sideline novels, the ones that say "Tom Clancy's" on them, that are written by other writers. They aren't really ghostwritten, they're sideline books where many different writers have a chance to get into the act. This is pretty common in publishing.

But Clancy's own novels are his, even though not all are of equal value. But I thought "Red October," "Red Storm Rising," Patriot Games," "Clear and Present Danger," "Without Remorse," "The Bear and the Dragon," and "Red Rabbit" were extremely good novels.

It's all those sideline novels that Clancy and his publisher have authorized that drive me batty.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
SRHowen said:
I used to read Patricia Cornwell--all of her books, loved them. Then she switched to a very annoying third person present tense, in a book in the series I was reading. I really tried to wade through the book, but couldn't, it was that bad.

When the next book came out, I got it at the library rather than buy it and when I discovered she was using the same POV--I didn't even read past the first pages. Another book in the series has come out--I picked it up at the book store, read page one --same POV, passed it by.

Next book out, I doubt I will even bother to check and see if it is in that POV, I have skipped three books now in the series---

Why she switched POV's and of all things decided to do present tense--I don't know, but I hate it.

Shawn

I had the same experience with Cornwell. I haven't been able to read any of her books since that switch.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Writers

Thekherham said:
I was just reading the thread about the worst book you ever read, and I thought I'd ask this question: If you read a really bad book by a certain author, do you not read whatever other books the author wrote ("If this book is so bad, I'm sure his other work must be pretty crappy, too."), or do you try other works by the same author. ("This book was really bad, but maybe one of his other books will be better.") In other words do you think authors are consistently good, or consistently bad (for the most part)?

Most often, if I hate the writing, then, no, I don't give that writer another chance. If I like teh writing but hate the story, then I do try that writer again.
 

scfirenice

professional multitasker
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2005
Messages
3,937
Reaction score
388
Location
Between a rock and a hard place.
I've done it both ways. Take Dan Brown, I loved A&D and TDC but hated digital fortress. Loved The Red Tent, didn't like anything else she ever wrote. If Brown came out with a new book? I'd get it.
 

MystiAnne

Registered
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Depends on why I didn't like it. If there were skill issues, I'm unlikely to go back unless someone recommends a particular book to me. If the writing is strong but just not my style, I will go back, as my tastes change over time and writers do too. Someone who has seen print with serious skill deficiencies is unlikely to get better, in my experience...

I go mostly on recommendations aobut an author or book from trusted fellow readers, as my To Read list is very long. As soon as I finish this current writing task I am taking a few weeks off to read the new Don Quixote translation as a reward :)
 

aadams73

A Work in Progress
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
9,901
Reaction score
6,428
Location
Oregon
Jamesaritchie said:
I had the same experience with Cornwell. I haven't been able to read any of her books since that switch.

Makes three of us, and it's a crying shame.
 

Vomaxx

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
681
Reaction score
68
Location
Minnesota
Website
andiriel.blogspot.com
"A precondition for reading good books is not reading bad ones. For life is short." (Schopenhauer)

An author gets one shot with me.
 

Summonere

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
136
reading habits

Whether or not I abandon an author depends on when, in reading his work, I encounter a bad book. I read a lot of Italo Calvino's work and loved all of it until I ran across Difficult Loves, which was a collection of fragments as opposed to real stories. Still haven't finished that one. Oh but I liked his stuff so much I kept reading his other books, then I encountered The Castle Of Crossed Destinies, the idea of which I liked immensely. Except the book, well ... haven't finished that one, either. Turns out it's boring. I've since bought two more of his books and look forward to reading them soon. When that's done, it seems I'll have read all of his stuff, and the majority of it is good enough to erase the two that didn't quite work for me.

Don DeLillo's The Body Artist, a quiet little exercise in literary stuttering, so repelled me that I haven't tried White Noise or Libra, though I have copies of both.

David Foster Wallace's Oblivion interested me briefly when someone told me that his writing was a lot like Thomas Pynchon's. Then I read a couple of stories in the collection and thought, egad, have the bestowers of literary merit all gone mad? I was so turned off by the little stories that I've not ventured into Infinite Jest, the first of his titles, and a very big one at that, that I thought I'd read. Turns out I've lost all interest in that one, too.

Then there are authors whose work I like a lot but who get dumped, for a time, because I get tired of their particular formula (when they have one) or approach (when they don't seem to have one -- a formula, that is). Raymond Chandler and Philip K Dick come to mind. I read a dozen of Dick's books, then quit because I started noticing variations of the same sorts of characters appearing in different sorts of plots. The effect was somewhat like seing your favorite actors in back-to-back-to-back movies, and though their costumes, circumstances, and indeed characters, changed from movie to movie, well, the same people were still behind it all. [If someone knows what I'm talking about, maybe they can explain it to me. That's the explanation I'm stuck with for now.] Raymond Chandler, on the other hand, started boring me for a different kind of sameness in his novels, a more structural kind. I still like what these guys wrote, but find it more refreshing to visit their worlds after vacationing in a few others, first.

So it goes.
 

BlueTexas

Back from self-exile land.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
220
Location
Aledo, TX
If I didn't like one, I'll try another by that same author. But I try new authors at the library most of the time, so I'm not out anything.

If I'd have ruled out Kingsolver on The Bean Trees, I'd have missed The Poisonwood Bible, which I loved. Some of my favorite authors had books I didn't care for, like Anne Rice's Cry to Heaven or King's The Tommyknockers. Same with Margaret Atwood. I hated Surfacing, but have enjoyed all of her other books.

My mood won't always match an author's, but that doesn't mean we won't synch up later.
 

Saanen

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
115
If it's an author whose books I ordinarily like and they serve up a clinker, I'll still try the next book. If it isn't good, I'll just reread the older books I did like and pretty much ignore new stuff. On the other hand, if it's an author I've never read before and I don't like the book, odds are not good I'll ever read anything else by that author.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Writers

If I gave writers only one shot to get it right, at least half my most loved writers wouldn't be on my list. If there's a writer out there who gets it right every time, I haven't found him.
 

scribbler1382

Write For You, Edit For The Reader
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
1,429
Reaction score
161
Location
Toronto
Website
www.soderstrom.ca
I'd like to say I'd give the author another chance, but on reflection I realize that when it's happened in the past, I've dumped them faster than Kerry dumped his medals. I remember one in particular, mostly because the author is actually responsible for what I consider the best short story I've ever read (or am likely to read). David Morrell. I was a huge fan, and when "Double Image" came out, I snapped it up without a thought. The first half of the book didn't disappoint. It was all I expected from Morrell and more. But I got the weird feeling that the book was ending and I was only halfway through. All of a sudden, the plot shifted -- hell, the whole book shifted, and now I was reading some kind of weird romance/relationship book using the characters from the first half of the book. I gave up and I've never bought another Morrell book since. I do still enjoy his short stories when they show up, but I doubt I'll ever buy another one of his books.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
Usually I try the author's best-selling, most "critically acclaimed" book. And if it sucks, I won't give the author another chance.
 

SRHowen

Erotica is not a four letter word!
Requiescat In Pace
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,055
Reaction score
349
Location
ON the edge of the insane feral.
Jamesaritchie said:
I had the same experience with Cornwell. I haven't been able to read any of her books since that switch.

Anyone have any idea why the F she did that???? Or why she has stuck to it? It really sucks poopy water.

Shawn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.