so your saying realistically speaking an agency isn't going to give eight hours a day to reading (by which of course i mean evaluate - why else engage with a query text?) e-queries? (200 queries / 25 = 8 hours.) So perhaps it is true to say they're not giving the attention required. i dunno, perhaps.Reading a query isn't what takes time, though if you're reading them as you should, it's going to take a heck of a lot longer than you seem to believe. Evaluating a query is what takes time. Sometimes this is easy and fast, sometimes tough and slow.
I can't read through fifty queries in an hour. Twenty-five is a more manageable number. And a single query can sometimes take twenty minutes to read and evaluate.
I can, however, reply personally to a hundred queries per week. This isn't difficult at all. A personal reply does not mean a three page critique letter, it just means a couple of sentences, and that's easy.
Now, as re the 100 personal replies - that was in reference to the good ol days of snail mail (far as i can make out) which would take, hmmm, being snail mail, em, 5mins a query? (ie, to read and mention a specific element of the query by letter, then place in envelope) so 5 mins X 100 = 500mins / 60 = 8 hours a week. Ouch. Fair play.
I'm beginning to think the agent reply quoted should have started at the line "I'm sorry for the impersonal response..." and delete the preceding bit.
anyway, can't see a reversal of the email query thingy, so when all is said and done...
Last edited: