Hi Captcha,
A fair and interesting rebuttal.
It is a possibility that I’m getting ahead of myself by starting there, but I decided to start there simply because it seemed at least like a very plausible idea.
As a teacher librarian (and former marketer, back before I became a teacher) I’m fascinated to watch how technology moves and disseminates within different age groups. It can be such a difficult thing to assess because it moves and changes so quickly.
Many of the younger generations have more disposable income than ever before (acknowledging for socio-economics as a big variable), so I’d have to agree that often their ability to purchase a reader is becoming less of an issue. But what I wonder is, is it because they don’t want one, or because the cost of an ereader/ipad/etc… is still not yet low enough to be an impulse purchase for them. I suspect at some near future point it will be, and I’ll be very curious to see what happens.
I also agree with you that if a kid really wants something (like a red ryder bb rifle with a compass in the stock and this thing that tells time) then there’s a good chance that they are going to eventually get their hands on one.
No argument from me here. But I lump the readers in with the ebooks themselves as being part of an impulse purchase. Teens undoubtedly could purchase one, but they are unlikely to because the sticker price is still too high for it to be an impulse purchase. The barrier is less their ability/inability to purchase one, and more that the price is currently too high for most of them to want to purchase one.
And a similar view regarding credit card access. Kids can make mom and dad reach into their wallet, but it takes sustained effort (the antithesis of making an impulse purchase) so it’s less likely to happen.
Access to e-readers and credit cards are not absolute barriers, but I do want to suggest that the hassle for kids to overcome these barriers is sufficient to put a real dent in impulse purchasing, which I suspect is why strictly e-publishing outfits will remain stand offish when it comes to publishing YA.
Regarding e-readers and patterns, I can share with you a few things:
My district is what I’d call mixed socioeconomic. We’ve got sections that are quite affluent, and other sections that are very much inner city. We’ve had success with the e-readers at the high school level, and I was the first to introduce them at the elementary school level to grades 6-7.
One thing that may have been a factor in our decision was that our school is very hands on with kids and tech. Lots of computers, laptop carts, IPADs, etc… by upper intermediate the kids are very proficient with the tech and handle it naturally. The specific school where I introduced them was also in an upper middle class neighbourhood. Mom and dad both tend to be university grads, there’s lots of tech around the home, and mom and dad tend to see tech literacy as being as important as numeracy or traditional literacy.
Before we rolled these out, I took the liberty of getting reps from Amazon/Kindle and KOBO on the phone as we were breaking some new ground and I didn’t want to blunder over copy write issues. These companies seemed to feel that copy write issues were still in flux, but that I could safely load one book file on up to 6 e-readers at one time w/o being in any danger of copy write violation.
For some of those really popular books like the Alley Carter series or Cherub, this format and copy write allowance made tremendous sense for a few reasons. 1. It meant that I’m functionally getting 6 copies for less than the price of 1 paperback. 2. These books normally got trashed, but because they are in e-format we’d have them forever (I figured the cost of periodic reader replacements into my calculations). 3. It meant we’d have lots of copies of the newest titles so that there wouldn’t be huge waitlists.
All the best…
Burnt Flesh