A female friend once told me that I'm single because I scare men, I'm too intelligent and that I should let men know I need them.
You only scare off the crap men.
It don't make no never mind to me if a poster is male or female though.
A female friend once told me that I'm single because I scare men, I'm too intelligent and that I should let men know I need them.
If I were a nice person I'd say thank you for the compliment.You only scare off the crap men.
It don't make no never mind to me if a poster is male or female though.
I think it also goes beyond being female as well. I've learned that some people come to expect certain things from online persona and even get offended when someone who they consider is nice, steps outside the box to be blunt and perhaps even confrontational.There's a phenomenon online, and yes, it's very much present here on AW, where women who are direct and specific are told that their "tone" is unacceptable.
I'm not talking about wanton malice, or being cruel. I'm not talking about, for instance, saying "your writing is shitty, and no one will ever publish you." Those are not acceptable, or even common, on AW.
When people assumed that medievalist=male, they were far more willing to tolerate me making an assertion of fact, than when they realized I was female. (And it's not like I hid it, for crying out loud; my name is on every post I've made.)
There are cultural assumptions that if you're female you should be "nice," that there are different standards for men and women.
ArsewipePS: Douchenozzle.
I have been known to get reps that are just shocked at my "behaviour" and they thought I was "nicer than that". Well, I can't be "nice" all the time and not compromise my own voice. Sometimes I will be blunt and do nothing to sugarcoat what I've to say.
I find it confining and frustrating to be pigeon-holed into someone's idea who who they think I am.
Weird.
No one ever tells me they thought I was "nicer than that."
Girls use teh intarwebz?There's a phenomenon online, and yes, it's very much present here on AW, where women who are direct and specific are told that their "tone" is unacceptable.
I'm not talking about wanton malice, or being cruel. I'm not talking about, for instance, saying "your writing is shitty, and no one will ever publish you." Those are not acceptable, or even common, on AW.
When people assumed that medievalist=male, they were far more willing to tolerate me making an assertion of fact, than when they realized I was female. (And it's not like I hid it, for crying out loud; my name is on every post I've made.)
There are cultural assumptions that if you're female you should be "nice," that there are different standards for men and women.
A female friend once told me that I'm single because I scare men, I'm too intelligent and that I should let men know I need them.
So I asked, "Would you tell a man to be so needy, or advise them to temper their personality?"
I can't believe there are people who still think like this.Here's a case in point. I just received a PM from a relatively new member in which he chastises me as "a young woman like yourself," for referring to Robert de Boron's Arthurian literature in the thirteenth century as Arthurian fan fic.
He asks "what right do you have to dismiss great literature" etc. etc.
Now, I'm not going to respond--but the thing is, he's starting from the assumptions that:
1. I am "young"--I'm not. I'm ancient. Middle-aged, anyway.
2. That he knows more about medieval Arthurian literature because, as he says, he's read and liked Malory.
3. That as an "older male" he has a right to chastise me--and he is aware that he is chastising me because he says he didn't want to correct me publicly (which actually is kind and thoughtful).
He doesn't have a right to chastise me, frankly, based on age or sex.
He might have one, based on knowledge.
But honestly? It's pretty unlikely, even on AW, that he would know more about this particular niche. (I'm not just being self-aggrandizing; I really am a medievalist, and my dissertation is Arthurian and Celtic).
But he knows I'm female. And that sort of starts his bizarre train of false assumptions.
Here's a case in point. I just received a PM from a relatively new member in which he chastises me as "a young woman like yourself," for referring to Robert de Boron's Arthurian literature in the thirteenth century as Arthurian fan fic.
He asks "what right do you have to dismiss great literature" etc. etc.
Now, I'm not going to respond--but the thing is, he's starting from the assumptions that:
1. I am "young"--I'm not. I'm ancient. Middle-aged, anyway.
2. That he knows more about medieval Arthurian literature because, as he says, he's read and liked Malory.
3. That as an "older male" he has a right to chastise me--and he is aware that he is chastising me because he says he didn't want to correct me publicly (which actually is kind and thoughtful).
He doesn't have a right to chastise me, frankly, based on age or sex.
He might have one, based on knowledge.
But honestly? It's pretty unlikely, even on AW, that he would know more about this particular niche. (I'm not just being self-aggrandizing; I really am a medievalist, and my dissertation is Arthurian and Celtic).
But he knows I'm female. And that sort of starts his bizarre train of false assumptions.
I know there are people who would read Medi's posts and think she's the soapboxing one, but believe you me, when you hear every day that you should be sugar and spice and all things nice, temper your personality, not be a bitch, a ballbreaker, wear a little makeup, tell men you need them, act a certain way to catch a husband, just be a little less...
I think it comes from an alpha male mentality. Power. Dominance. An intelligent woman is--subconsciously--seen as a threat to his autonomy and control. I'm not a femininst, but I think that mindset is retarded and neanderthalish.I get that too. I get told my intelligence intimidates them, when they should be far more worried about my chainsaw and flamethrower.