"Writing is probably not for you" is rarely a justifiable sentence, especially when it's short for "If the things that work for me don't work for you as a writer, then writing is probably not for you."
Every writer should be a reader, but not every writer is a rereader. Seems like I've heard lots of writer friends say that they don't enjoy rereading. And yet they are writers.
Amb: Since I am a rereader, I have no good advice to offer the non-rereader on how to make revisions, or revisions after a manuscript's had some drawer-time, more feasible. But I'm sure there must be, because many successful writers are non-rereaders after all.
When I pull a manuscript out of the drawer after it's been sitting there awhile, sometimes I find I come to it as though it were a story someone else wrote that I read a long time ago. I no longer have access to the thoughts I had when I was writing it, but then they can't get in my way anymore either. Rewriting it at this point means it will become something different from what I intended when I wrote it--and generally that's a good thing.
When you do succeed at a rewrite, what worked for you?