- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 5,239
- Reaction score
- 1,017
James, that's 7 million PEOPLE, not dollars.
Yeah, I realized that after I posted.
I thought 7 million dollars seemed ridiculously low.
James, that's 7 million PEOPLE, not dollars.
I don't know that someone said it, but it's an idea postulated by some economists, supported by some computer modeling. Though, it wouldn't be the exact same people, due to demographics, idle wealth, and chance, imo. And there would actually be a more severe distribution (bigger gap between rich and poor) over time, because of the idle wealth going someplace else.I've heard that someone once theorize by dividing all the wealth of the world equally and then "starting over" so to speak with a free market, the same people who were "rich" before would end up with the majority of the wealth within just a few years?
Does anyone know who said this?
"The fruits of productivity gains have been skewed towards the highest earners, and towards companies, whose profits have reached record levels as a share of GDP."