Wait.
It doesn't appear to have specifically been a rape case:
http://www.dailytarheel.com/article/2012/12/victims-speak-up-on-assault
As a freshman, Gambill was continually abused — sexually and verbally — by her long-term boyfriend.
When the relationship ended, she said she was met with months of stalking, threats and harassment.
Those actions lead her to press charges with the Honor Court. In her trial, Gambill said she was forced to answer irrelevant and inappropriate questions.
The time issue is not clear at all, but by my reading, she reported the assault(s)/rape(s) to the school well after the fact. And that's a serious problem, both for her and the school.
And according to The Daily Tar Heel, the make-up of the Honor Court at the time:
From January to August, all cases were heard by a special University Hearings Board, a panel consisting of two Honor Court students, two faculty members and one administrative chair.
As I said, I'm inclined to believe her, to accept that she's gotten a very raw deal. But unfortunately, the best path for her was to report the crimes immediately to the police and she did not do that (I realize it's not a simple thing to ask, though).
She reported them later to the school, did not get any satisfaction (though the school didn't handle things particularly well, imo), and so has been speaking out about what she claims happened.
Supposing--for a moment--that she's not being truthful, what would that mean? How should the school respond?
If my ex-girlfriend in college was running around telling everyone I had raped her or the like and I knew I had done no such thing, should I be able to complain to the school? I'm not sure, to be honest, but I don't think all of the criticism here is wholly warranted.