• Basic Writing questions is not a crit forum. All crits belong in Share Your Work

Different POV question: changing POV mid-series

Status
Not open for further replies.

Carrie in PA

Write All The Words!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
1,942
Reaction score
1,078
Location
in my own little world
I have no idea what I'll end up doing here, but I thought I'd throw it out to see what you guys think. For NaNo, I'm doing Book 3 of the series I'm working on.

Basically, Book 1's MC is Casey. When I was almost finished with it, her friend Tabitha decided she needed her own book.

Book 2 follows Tabitha. A minor character in Tab's book, Betsy, decided she was next.

Book 3 follows Betsy. (And I already have an idea for Book 4, which will follow a minor character from Betsy's story.)

So here's my dilemma. Books 1 & 2 are 3rd person, and they both work very well from that POV. Betsy's story, though, will work better in 1st person. Would you find it jarring if Book 3 of a series you were reading jumped to 1st person?

Each book is stand-alone, but I'm kind of thinking they should all follow the same sort of stylistic format, so I feel like I should stick to 3rd.

On the other hand, I think I'll be able to make greater progress if I write it in 1st, and I can always change it later, right? :Shrug:
 

Osulagh

Independent fluffy puppy.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
222
Location
My dog house.
Why first? And why do you feel like you'll make greater progress in first?

I can see changing POVs between characters between books, but changing the narrative style might urk me as a reader. I would need a really good reason why the third book of the series is written in first.
 

Chris P

Likes metaphors mixed, not stirred
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
22,664
Reaction score
7,354
Location
Wash., D.C. area
I'm trying to think if I've ever encountered this, but I can't remember if I have. That either means 1) it's just not done, 2) it's done and doesn't bother me so I don't notice, or 3) I'm not paying enough attention.

But does a change from 3rd to 1st by itself make it stylistically different? I don't think it necessarily has to. I think you can quite easily preserve the flavor of the first two in the third, even with the change in POV. Go for it.
 

Siri Kirpal

Swan in Process
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
3,151
Location
In God I dwell, especially in Eugene OR
Sat Nam! (Literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

If they're all stand alones anyway, it wouldn't bother me at all. Third book of a tight trilogy, yeah, I'd mind.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal
 

K.S. Crooks

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
217
Reaction score
28
Location
Toronto
I am currently reading the third book in a series. In books 1 and 2 it is told in the main characters first person. Book 3 is first person of the initial main character and a second one. This character view alternates per chapter.
I have read books like this before but I do find this more annoying because I was so used to one person's perspective. I find I have to remind myself who the "I" is referring to.
If your books are completely stand alone then I say go ahead and change the perspective. If there is some continuation of major plot lines then stick with what you were doing. Good luck.
 

StoryofWoe

Sick and pale with grief.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2014
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
89
Location
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene.
If it's characters from the same universe, I'd stick to a consistent perspective. It may not technically be a series, but it's close enough, and I know I'd probably find it a bit disorienting. I'm curious, what makes you think you can't tell this character's story as effectively from third person?
 

Carrie in PA

Write All The Words!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
1,942
Reaction score
1,078
Location
in my own little world
Thanks, everyone!

If it's characters from the same universe, I'd stick to a consistent perspective. It may not technically be a series, but it's close enough, and I know I'd probably find it a bit disorienting.

That's my gut feeling. They're all connected by virtue of living in the same place and knowing each other, even though their stories are completely stand alone.

I'm curious, what makes you think you can't tell this character's story as effectively from third person?

It's not that I can't or even shouldn't write it in 3rd, but the POV kind of "appears" with the voices in my head. LOL It's just one of those things. I've had some stories come to me that are just naturally 3rd person, and some that come to me in 1st. Since this one just kind of came to my mind as 1st, I feel like it'd feel more natural to write it that way (ergo, easier to write that way).
 
Last edited:

Alli B.

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
117
Reaction score
13
Personal preference: I hate when a series isn't consistent. I've seen where it was necessary to change things up a bit for a few reasons, and it still bothers me.
 

Thomas Vail

What?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
506
Reaction score
57
Location
Chicago 'round
It would be a jarring change, but if you feel you can tell a better story using the first person... *shrug* You can't really argue if people end up liking it.
 

Once!

Still confused by shoelaces
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
2,965
Reaction score
433
Location
Godalming, England
Website
www.will-once.com
I'm about to do something similar. Book one is written in first from one character's POV. Book two will be written in the first person perspective of one of the other characters.

But switching from third to first within the same series? I can't think of an example of that being done before. It might work, it might be a stroke of genius, but it seems risky.
 

Mr Flibble

They've been very bad, Mr Flibble
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
18,889
Reaction score
5,029
Location
We couldn't possibly do that. Who'd clear up the m
Website
francisknightbooks.co.uk
But switching from third to first within the same series? I can't think of an example of that being done before. It might work, it might be a stroke of genius, but it seems risky.


Patricia Cornwell's Scarpetta series switches from first to third later on (and from past to present, I think). Not universally popular IIRC but she's still swimming in money sooo....
 
Last edited:

Once!

Still confused by shoelaces
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
2,965
Reaction score
433
Location
Godalming, England
Website
www.will-once.com
I'm sure that just about every trick has been tried by someone at some time. After all, doesn't Amazon list more than a million books?
 

WriteMinded

Derailed
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
6,216
Reaction score
784
Location
Paradise Lost
I would expect Book 3 to follow the model of Books 1 & 2. If I loved the first books, I would probably buy the 3rd without giving it a once-over. (I usually order my books from Amazon and don't "Look Inside" the ones written by my favorite authors.) I am not fond of 1st person, so I'd be kicking myself for making assumptions. A comment on the back cover about it being written from that perspective would be helpful.
 

benbenberi

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
2,810
Reaction score
865
Location
Connecticut
Steven Brust's Vlad Taltos series (14 books so far) is written mainly in 1st person, with Vlad as the narrator. Book 7, however, was all 3rd person: the primary POV was a new character, the other was an animal. It was an interesting change of pace, but the book was not well received by a lot of readers, and while Brust continues to experiment with narrative he has pretty much stuck with his 1st person narrator since then.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
I can remember who wrote it, but I once read a trilogy where book one was first person from the POV of the protagonist. Book two was third person from the POV of one of the enemy. Book three went back to the first person POV of the protagonist.

I remember thinking it worked pretty well, but not well enough to make me remember who the writer was.
 

tko

just thanks fore everything
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
2,724
Reaction score
626
Location
Los Angeles
Website
500px.com
tight 3rd?

Honestly, there is little difference in feel between tight 3rd and 1st--just a pronoun away. I wouldn't even notice if done well. And I'm speaking from fact, some of my favorite writers switch from 1st to 3rd with the same character and I didn't notice (w/a year between novels), and you have different characters.

The style and pacing was kept the same though.
 

WriteMinded

Derailed
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
6,216
Reaction score
784
Location
Paradise Lost
I can remember who wrote it, but I once read a trilogy where book one was first person from the POV of the protagonist. Book two was third person from the POV of one of the enemy. Book three went back to the first person POV of the protagonist.

I remember thinking it worked pretty well, but not well enough to make me remember who the writer was.
That kind of switch would not bother me so much. But a change from 3rd to 1st, that I wouldn't like.
 

Ellie_2014

Registered
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
It's completely up to you - I'm sure I've seen this done before. However, as a reader, I prefer it when POV remains consistent.
 

A_Read

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
177
Reaction score
27
Location
Virginia
Only books I've read that I can remember doing this were the Cotswold Mystery series by Rebecca Tope. The first two were 3rd, focused on the MC. Then the third switched and was in 1st from the POV of another character. Subsequent books went back to 3rd of original MC. All I will say is that it took me almost a chapter to realize that the "I's" in book 3 were not referring to the normal MC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.