1) The people buying these targets (for sincere, not ironic, use) are scumbag bigots. Despicable. Disgusting.
2) The guy selling them is a tasteless but very savvy businessman.
3) I can't agree with Zimmerman's attorney that the target-maker should be criminally charged. How is profiting off people's bigotry a crime? At the very least, the accusation of hatemongering is countered by the target maker's right to free speech. These items are clearly intended for private use. They aren't being used to organize or motivate groups of people to do violence.
The bigots were already out there saying and doing terrible things long before the Trayvon Martin tragedy.
I dunno, it seems kinda weird that we're focusing on how terrible the target-maker is when he says in the article that he's just trying to profit off the controversy. Why not focus on the armed and deluded crazies buying the targets?
Also, sorry if I missed something, but where did the "misogyny" remark come from? (Yorkist, post #6.) As far as I can tell this has been focused clearly on racism.