"Lyon straddles the Rhone River, a waterway so deep and navigable that sea faring ships have long sailed its waters, cargo ships carriyng precious trade goods north and south. In the Middle Ages, the silk industry centered at Lyon where the Saone and the Rhone converge. To this day the covered streets in the old town lead from the old manufacturies down to the river. Where once the precious goods were protected from the hazards of the weather, the tunnels remain, their dark and twisting passages used again during WWII as escape routes and traps by members of the French Resistance."
Green =present. Red=past.
Okay, we're talking about history, geography, economics, and remnants of the past existing to the present day. Is it distracting to mix the tenses, to remind readers that, for all the changes, the place is real? My concern is that the story is written in past tense, but it seems wrong to me to use past tense for what still exists, the rivers, the cities, the tunnels.
I have the feeling this has been discussed before, but I have no idea where to look. Anyone care to comment?
Green =present. Red=past.
Okay, we're talking about history, geography, economics, and remnants of the past existing to the present day. Is it distracting to mix the tenses, to remind readers that, for all the changes, the place is real? My concern is that the story is written in past tense, but it seems wrong to me to use past tense for what still exists, the rivers, the cities, the tunnels.
I have the feeling this has been discussed before, but I have no idea where to look. Anyone care to comment?
Last edited: