Any beta who gives a 'flaming crit' or rips a piece apart has no business being a beta. The whole purpose of being a beta is to give constructive criticism. That means honesty, not nastiness.
True. But I want someone who has the integrity to call it as they honestly see it. If my MS wasted their time, and I hope it wouldn't, I can understand if they call me out on it
THIS^Even though no one likes to think their work's imperfect, I know the reality is that honest critiquing is invaluable.
The problem is to find a beta who can articulate how to make the book better. They can be as rude as they want as long as they improve the book.
I, as a rather rude beta reader sometimes, make that my sole aim. I want my writers to make the very best out of their works, that's why I invest my time reading and commenting in the first place.
I, as a rather rude beta reader sometimes, make that my sole aim. I want my writers to make the very best out of their works, that's why I invest my time reading and commenting in the first place.
I don't have problem with critiques.
I do have problem with beta readers who can't follow directions. The beta phase for me is a first draft thing. I want to know whether the plot is heading in the right direction, whether the characters are appealing, whether elements of the world building are confusing or misleading.
I can't stand beta readers who think they are my editor. I have three editors at my pub, thank you. There's no point to your treatise on the virtues of the Oxford comma since the chapter containing that sentence may not survive the second draft.
If there's a mistake that's so repetitive you feel like you have to say something ... okay say something about it. If there's something in my wording that is confusing or just pulls you out of the story, yes you should point it out. But during the first draft I really do not give the slightest **** that I typed 'to' instead of 'too'. It's irrelevant, and in my mind there's nothing worse than sending a story to a beta and getting back pages of copy-editor style corrections with no actual beta reading feedback >.>
end rant .... *cough*..... *hides*
Making improving the book your sole aim is one thing, but being able to articulate HOW is something else entirely. If you can articulate it, then you are a very valuable beta indeed.
Vixey, to be honest, I'd rather have the whole story than just a chapter; I can't get my teeth into just one chapter, especially if it's a short one. I want to get the feel of the writer's voice, it makes me understand the story from their POV .
/////
When I tell someone what doesn't work in their novels, I try and help them out with suggestions, even if that means altering the story a little in parts, but I still class myself as a beta-reader.
/////
I'm mentioned in the acknowledgements of another AWer's novel that's coming out in March, I think that says something about my value as a beta reader. Actually, I am chuffed to bits (overwhelmed) that anyone would even think I was worth that much.