It keeps getting better

brokenfingers

Walkin' That Road
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
6,072
Reaction score
4,324
AP Investigation: Banks sought foreign workers


SANTA CLARA, Calif. – Banks collecting billions of dollars in federal bailout money sought government permission to bring thousands of foreign workers to the U.S. for high-paying jobs, according to an Associated Press review of visa applications.


The dozen banks receiving the biggest rescue packages, totaling more than $150 billion, requested visas for more than 21,800 foreign workers over the past six years for positions that included senior vice presidents, corporate lawyers, junior investment analysts and human resources specialists. The average annual salary for those jobs was $90,721, nearly twice the median income for all American households.


The figures are significant because they show that the bailed-out banks, being kept afloat with U.S. taxpayer money, actively sought to hire foreign workers instead of American workers. As the economic collapse worsened last year — with huge numbers of bank employees laid off — the numbers of visas sought by the dozen banks in AP's analysis increased by nearly one-third, from 3,258 in fiscal 2007 to 4,163 in fiscal 2008.

I have a question: Was there any type of oversight provided with the bailout money last fall? Were there any provisions or stipulations provided with that money?

Are these financial institutions being held accountable for it? You know, like they do when they lend out money themselves?
 

Plot Device

A woman said to write like a man.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
11,973
Reaction score
1,867
Location
Next to the dirigible docking station
Website
sandwichboardroom.blogspot.com
It is WAY more expensive to hire a foriegn worker for these kinds of upscale white collar because you have to pay all kinds of fees.

I suspect these banks have multi-national interetss, and hiring these workers from certain key nations was a smart way to keep a competitive egde in those nations, as well as good relations.

But in the end, what is the ultimate purpose for the very existence of these banks???? Is it not to be an important fundtioning part of the US domestic monetary system?? And is that function right there too imporant to allow it to be compromised by such willy-nilly extravagance?

Would it maybe be better to re-introduce a Glass-Steagal Part II so that invetsment banks and savings banks are kept separate, and also so that domestic banks and multi-national banks are also kept separate?
 

cethklein

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
452
Location
USA
Plot Device's take seems valid. I suspect these banks have interests outside the US.

On this subject, I still firmly believe that the government WANTED these banks to sue bailout money to buy up smaller banks. They'll never admit it, but I'll almost wager that's what they want behind closed doors. They never intended for banks to loan that money. They figured "let them buy up banks so that we don't have 100 small ones going bust in one day." You'll never get an admission to this but I firmly believe it to be true, it makes perfect sense.