I thought it looked interesting (got the info in my Borders newsletter), but I decided to forego it. It's an interesting concept!!
Its rating has gone up. I agree with you, it reads pretty well (certainly compared with the other two entries, which IMO are one-paragraph rejects). Just one problem: it's NONFICTION. The rules say the contest is for novels only. Then there was the entry with three chapters posted at once, when the rules say first chapter only for Round 1. What's going on with these non-appropriate postings? Are the Gather folks not vetting the entries, or is the submission level so low that they're worried?Julie Worth said:Could be. "The Travel Clinic" seemed to be decent, interesting writing, but the first person to come along slapped it with a 1 out of 10.
Athena said:If I posted a portion of my novel in the contest, and it generated good reviews based on the strength of my writing and not on politicking - might this be a source for a new fanbase? One that would be interested in reading the rest of my novel? If I had good ratings and good reviews, would an agent be interested in hearing that even if I didn't make it into the final round? If I generated good buzz?
Scrawler said:Last year, I was under the impression that Gather was a site for writers ready to post their work for critique, and polish their craft. I soon learned that it was nothing more than a "myspace gone bad" with flame wars, character assassinations against other members, circulating hate-list to new members via private email, false accounts created to slam other members, cliques campaigning behind the scenes to pump up ratings and votes for those in the circle, and bombarding "outsiders" with low ratings and harassing comments. Twenty word "articles" (many cut/pasted from Wikipedia or online newspapers with no sources sited) were posted to earn comments, which translated into points, which translated into gift cards or cash. I don't recommend anyone participate on the site, and would certainly be wary of entering into any agreement with Gather.com. Be afraid, be very afraid.
Besides, if you haven't spent the last year politicking on the site, building your "network", joining the appropriate cliques, and proclaiming your undying love to the ringmasters by faithfully offering lavish praise for their every misspelled and grammatically incorrect word, your work will be rated low and dismissed with negative comments. Or worse, ignored completely.
I'd rather get a legitimate agent rejection then go anywhere near that site again. I'm just glad I used a pseudonym there.
I think that the 5-day requirement (the winner must sign the S&S contract within 5 days of receipt) is intended to head off just such a possibility--to make it really hard, if not impossible, for an author to run out and get an agent on the strength of the contract, who'd then want to negotiate contract clauses and a bigger advance.Athena said:II've got several concerns and questions about entering this contest. If lightning were to strike and I actually won the competition - would I be able to have someone like Robert Pimm be able to help me negotiate altering the boilerplate terms?
I don't think an agent would be at all impressed by something like this. No offense, but a bunch of strangers giving you votes on Gather.com doesn't say anything about the marketability of your work. Even if every one of those voters signed a pledge to buy your book once it was published--and in reality, no one can say how, or if, votes and ratings on a social networking site might translate into actual book sales--a few hundred readers is a drop in the bucket when you're talking sales expectations of many thousands for a commercially published book.If I posted a portion of my novel in the contest, and it generated good reviews based on the strength of my writing and not on politicking - might this be a source for a new fanbase? One that would be interested in reading the rest of my novel? If I had good ratings and good reviews, would an agent be interested in hearing that even if I didn't make it into the final round? If I generated good buzz?
Like this woman? This is the only one I've heard about.Several other HP fanfic authors have signed contracts with publishers and have books coming out. Part of their appeal was they had a fanbase prior to publication.
Several other HP fanfic authors have signed contracts with publishers and have books coming out. Part of their appeal was they had a fanbase prior to publication.
PeeDee said:Crank: You did take the plunge last night alone, because I wound up staying late at work and not getting home until a very silly hour. If you've submitted, then I said I would, and I shall. I have to be at the bookstore very shortly, but I will send my submission in tonight, no matter what silly hour it is. Otherwise, it'd make a liar outta me.
Manat said:On second look it seems to be getting stranger. Theres an entry fully of glaring typos of the OUCH! variety that has scored 10 out of 10 and is from the UK, even though they say only US residents. Seems there's no entry fee, no vetting, ergo no rules. It makes one wonder if there's a real publishing contract at the end. I'd give this one a little more time to see how it plays out.
Julie Worth said:Maybe it hasn't started yet?
Q) When will the first entries be posted?
A) The first entries will be posted Monday January 15th, 2007.
Bartholomew said:Um, this contest raises so many red flags for me that it isn't even funny.
PeeDee said:......So what's this stuff that's appearing and looking very entry-like?
victoriastrauss said:Suspecting that S&S isn't involved is way too paranoid, IMO. Touchstone's VP and publisher has been quoted in the NY Times on the contest, and there's been other news coverage; plus, Gather.com isn't some fly by night outfit; it's a big commercial website and it would be very much NOT in its interest to fabricate something like this. You've gotta put this stuff in context before you start hauling out the conspiracy theories.