sarahdalton
Banned
I think we've all seen that they've still got lots of reading to do and probably won't be in touch for a while.
I keep checking in everyday to see what's what
I keep checking in everyday to see what's what
all quite on the Western front...Flash Friday...
So far, all quiet on the eastern front...
Well, NYC is shutting down due to impending blizzard...
Wow, I know I prayed to the heavens to speed things up, but...Well, the readers and editors should get a lot of reading done this weekend then...
Well, yeah. Exactly. I live with several people addicted to those items and the batt doesn't last all that long when playing MineCraft and Facebooking and watching every episode of Prison Break known to mankind. LOL
ETA: We have received a number of questions about our recent acquisition of Katherine Harbour’s THORN JACK trilogy. To confirm, Katherine submitted THORN JACK to the Harper Voyager submissions herself. She was unagented during the submission. Thao Le at the Sandy Dijkstra Agency had previously worked with Katherine on revisions and has now negotiated the global Harper Voyager deal. She is representing Katherine for all unsold rights and future projects. The Voyager digital submissions are for unagented submissions (we receive many agented submissions that are handled completely independently from these submissions), but potential authors may certainly seek representation if they are offered publication.
Who knows.Just wanted to note that HV updated with this to answer questions about Katherine Harbour:
I'm still pretty much a newbie to the whole agent/publisher thing, but that thing about Thao Le helping her with revisions but not being her agent seems weird to me. Does anyone have an explanation?
It's not uncommon when submitting to agents to get an R&R response from one (revise and resubmit); an agent is interested in your work but feels that it needs changes before the agent offers representation. The agent suggests edits in structure, characters, plot, etc., and then gives you the opportunity to work on them and resubmit the edited manuscript. If they like the new version, they then offer to represent it. Harbour probably got an R&R from Le, and in the process of working on those changes (which sometimes take months if the agent recommends substantial edits) took a shot at the Harper Voyager open submission window, like the rest of us. When HV contacted her with enthusiasm, it's an easy email to Le (who is already familiar with the work) and an even easier sale for the agent. Slam dunk.
Ah, thank you. That makes sense. I wasn't trying to imply that HV or Harbour or anyone did anything unethical, I just didn't understand an agent taking the time to advise on revisions when they're not representing.
Any thoughts on the eerie silence Nick?