- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Messages
- 5,489
- Reaction score
- 609
I'll admit, it's addictive. My ninth book will be released next month and it never seems to get old.
For a long while I tried with romance, because it seemed like a more practical choice (market), but didn't get anywhere with it, and honestly my heart wasn't in it, so now I write what I love, trite as that sounds.
See, I guess what I'm wondering, is how to reconcile these seemingly opposing but equally valid approaches to writing. Would I be wrong in assuming that what most of us want is a readership? For those of us who've yet to build a readership, would we agree that there's a decision to be made? The decision between (a) studying the markets, choosing a vibrant market that you have some talent for, and writing to that market and (b) letting your interests and preferences, write whatever book you want to write, regardless of what genre label someone else will slap on it after the fact.
For me, it's all about readership. With that should come some money. A lot would be nice, some would be acceptable, but I really don't know how you get a readership without selling a lot of books. At the risk of repeating myself, do we believe that the best way to get a readership is to write to a healthy market, or to write what some have suggested on this thread, what you love, and therefore, you would think, where you will be most effective? I'm obviously torn between which direction I should go in. Maybe there's no universal answer, and I will say that I've noticed that when you have restrictions, limitations, (genre rules) it forces you to find creativity within that structure.
(I hope some of this makes a little sense - I'm grappling with ideas)