bikrpreacher
Banned
DeePower said:
We have a thousand authors who have not had one book printed. That goes to prove we take the same risk in publishing anything as every other mainstream publisher." huh?
DeePower said:
bikrpreacher said:We have a thousand authors who have not had one book printed. That goes to prove we take the same risk in publishing anything as every other mainstream publisher." huh?
Kate StAmour said:Personally, I wouldn't do it. I also, do not recommend this type of tactic. I think we all need to hold ourselves to the highest professional and moral standards otherwise we are not going to appear credible when it counts.
And yes, it is mean. Authors are not enemies, even ones that are cruel and abusive.
Note: *I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.*
DeePower said:
bikrpreacher said:Well, okay then, not a problem. And I asked for it didn't I?
The timing and dates clearly contradict this assertion -- there was no rejection until after the hoax was announced. Period.As for the hoax book, cooked up by author James D. MacDonald with the help of more than 30 SF and fantasy writers, Clopper admitted that PublishAmerica's acquisitions team accepted the manuscript before reading the entire thing, but added that staffers later noticed problems and suggested it be rejected before MacDonald went public.
Right. Name some names. And I'll bet those will be acceptances by a long-established writer handing in a manuscript he had been contracted for (and they'll read those, anyway). No mainstream publisher is going to make an offer to buy a manuscript by an unknown writer (like "Travis Tea") unless they have read the entire thing.Clopper said many mainstream publishers similarly do not read the entire manuscript before making an offer of publication.
The latter. He admitted it in the Washington Post article--PA has 1,000 authors who've never sold a single book.triceretops said:Now wait a minute. Doesn't that mean they have a thousand writers who have signed contracts but their books haven't gone into production yet? Is that what he's trying to say? Or does he mean he has a thousand authors who haven't sold a book because there is no interest for that book
Aside from all the other comments about this particular remark, how does Larry think this statement is a defense of PA? Admitting that 9% of their authors never get their books printed would make me run away as fast as I could, even I didn't know about the other problems.We have a thousand authors who have not had one book printed.
keltora said:There are main stream publishers who reject books from page one...
Laura J. Underwood (A Little Bit of Travis Tea--My ATLANTA NIGHTS can poke out your EYE OF ARGON any day!)
DRAGON'S TONGUE forthcoming from Meisha Merlin in the Summer of 2006. Preview a copy at http://www.embiid.net.
cwgranny said:I am constantly amazed that Clopper goes on about the over 1000 books that haven't sold a single copy as if that's a good thing. Why not simply say, "Well, yeah, if you don't buy your own books and sell them yourself, we sure ain't gonna do it and here's 1000 books as proof. Those rotten authors refused to pony up so we ended up stuck for two author copies -- the swine." Right...maybe they should say that in the acceptance letters. They'd end up with a lost fewer honked off writers.
Sher2 said:I find myself spending way too much time wondering just how long his nose is by now.