- Joined
- Jan 21, 2011
- Messages
- 7,212
- Reaction score
- 974
- Location
- Massachusetts, USA
- Website
- www.facebook.com
Hi, all. I’m obsessing over the staging of movements in my opening chapter, and I’m having trouble finding information on appropriate police procedure in a given situation. Maybe it’s a judgment call, and all this needs to be is believable, so I'd like to hear either actual procedure or informed opinions as to believability. I did a search for this topic and found one older thread similar but not quite the same, because I have my cops doing related stuff that I have questions about, too.
This is an supernatural detective story. The big event in this scene involves a ghost.
The scene is a park, late at night, in a small Vermont town (pop.between 2500-3000 people correction: about 4000), in the present day. The town has a small police force supported as needed by partnership with other towns and state police. I looked that arrangement up. The primary model for my town and police department is Brandon, Vermont. Link to Brandon PD website.
Two officers in a patrol car are heading home at the end of their shift. They pass a park. The park covers the banks of a river. One of them, my FMC, notices suspicious activity in the park as they cross the bridge over the river. The disturbance - weird lights - seems to be occurring on both sides. I have them split up to cover each bank. They maintain radio contact. It seems it is a false alarm. They find nothing.
However, upon heading back to meet her partner, my FMC is confronted by a ghost which attacks her. MMC, who is there for a reason we learn later, comes to her aid, and they escape and rejoin FMC’s partner.
Main question:
> Would two police officers split up like that to investigate a scene that has two distinct sections, such as the banks of a river?
Lesser questions:
> Would cops getting off work late at night call in to sign off duty rather than go in to the station house?
> Would cops in such a place park a patrol car at their house? Or would they go to the station to switch vehicles?
I have another question about the aftermath of this in my second chapter:
Upon rejoining her partner, FMC lies about what happened. She doesn’t want to say she saw a ghost, obviously, so she blurts out the first thing that pops into her nerve-wracked mind. She says she was attacked by some feral dogs.
Later, I have it that she is not believed (her superiors have reason), but procedure is followed anyway for the sake of due diligence. I have that procedure as: 1) Getting a statement about it from MMC. 2) Handing it off to Animal Control for the county (I'll look up who that is later). 3) Animal Control putting out some humane traps, catching some raccoons, and ridiculing the town cops for thinking raccoons are dogs. 4) That pretty much does it. The world moves on.
> Does that response to a report of feral dogs in a modern rural Vermont town seem likely?
Thanks.
This is an supernatural detective story. The big event in this scene involves a ghost.
The scene is a park, late at night, in a small Vermont town (pop.
Two officers in a patrol car are heading home at the end of their shift. They pass a park. The park covers the banks of a river. One of them, my FMC, notices suspicious activity in the park as they cross the bridge over the river. The disturbance - weird lights - seems to be occurring on both sides. I have them split up to cover each bank. They maintain radio contact. It seems it is a false alarm. They find nothing.
However, upon heading back to meet her partner, my FMC is confronted by a ghost which attacks her. MMC, who is there for a reason we learn later, comes to her aid, and they escape and rejoin FMC’s partner.
Main question:
> Would two police officers split up like that to investigate a scene that has two distinct sections, such as the banks of a river?
Lesser questions:
> Would cops getting off work late at night call in to sign off duty rather than go in to the station house?
> Would cops in such a place park a patrol car at their house? Or would they go to the station to switch vehicles?
I have another question about the aftermath of this in my second chapter:
Upon rejoining her partner, FMC lies about what happened. She doesn’t want to say she saw a ghost, obviously, so she blurts out the first thing that pops into her nerve-wracked mind. She says she was attacked by some feral dogs.
Later, I have it that she is not believed (her superiors have reason), but procedure is followed anyway for the sake of due diligence. I have that procedure as: 1) Getting a statement about it from MMC. 2) Handing it off to Animal Control for the county (I'll look up who that is later). 3) Animal Control putting out some humane traps, catching some raccoons, and ridiculing the town cops for thinking raccoons are dogs. 4) That pretty much does it. The world moves on.
> Does that response to a report of feral dogs in a modern rural Vermont town seem likely?
Thanks.
Last edited: