- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
- Messages
- 141
- Reaction score
- 11
This was recently. I figured since every poem is a transfer of emotions, every line and word should be written from the emotion. The emotion then produces the impulse of the words. If I get the emotion and desire the words, the words just come. I only know what they mean in the same way the reader knows what they mean, from the feeling they produce and the sensing of the overtones. It is sort of an inner knowledge, that maybe can't be articulated in any other way than by this specific sequence of words of the poem. This emotion should then carry the words from the beginning to the end of the poem. I do nothing to the poem if I don't have the emotion.
I used to produce lots of low quality words and lines because I would go in and out of the emotion. I also edited without having the emotion. It would be disastrous. If I edit I do the same as writing, having the emotion guides what gets taken out or added in. By ignoring this I both spent alot of time and ruined a poem I posted here awhile ago.
So the emotion is the guiding force of the poem as it is written down. If I take that out there is nothing guiding the words. This was my problem in the past. There would be glimpses in the poem followed by clumsiness.
This doesn't make certain if the poem will be good or bad - I mean I still produce low quality poems - just that there atleast is an emotion the reader can feel by reading it. That will make it worthwhile for both of us.
I was doing this method all along, just not steadfastly because I didn't realize and articulate it.
Do you think I am right about this?
What else could I add to my method?
I used to produce lots of low quality words and lines because I would go in and out of the emotion. I also edited without having the emotion. It would be disastrous. If I edit I do the same as writing, having the emotion guides what gets taken out or added in. By ignoring this I both spent alot of time and ruined a poem I posted here awhile ago.
So the emotion is the guiding force of the poem as it is written down. If I take that out there is nothing guiding the words. This was my problem in the past. There would be glimpses in the poem followed by clumsiness.
This doesn't make certain if the poem will be good or bad - I mean I still produce low quality poems - just that there atleast is an emotion the reader can feel by reading it. That will make it worthwhile for both of us.
I was doing this method all along, just not steadfastly because I didn't realize and articulate it.
Do you think I am right about this?
What else could I add to my method?