SeanDSchaffer said:
I'm wondering if the person we're talking about could possibly have a mental issue? I'm not trying to excuse what he does, but it does occur to me that that might be why he's not being convinced of his publisher's problems...My case manager explained this, saying that the worst thing you can do with a delusional person is tell them they're wrong. This is because they're so convinced they're right that they'll do anything to defend their delusion.
I don't think it's a mental health issue in this case so much as a self-esteem issue. To criticize his publisher's core business practices comes awfully close to home.
To be a PA author and admit they are a scam means you have to face the fact you've been duped. That's a terrible reality to face, and a lot of people will try to avoid that as long as they can. After all, a new PA author has already made a lot of noise to friends and family about getting their book accepted by a real, "traditional" publisher. It's proof that they are an honest-to-goodness author. It's a dream come true.
To go back to everyone and say, "My publisher is really just a vanity press, and it turns out they will publish just about anything. I have no more a career as an author now than I did before I submitted the manuscript to them," has got to be one of the most hurtful and humiliating things that can happen to an aspiring author.
Most people fade away out of embarrassment when they have been scammed, not just by PA but by any professional con artist. Grifters at any level count on their victims' embarassment and refusal to speak up. A small percentage of people get angry, tell their stories in public, and make their complaints known.
But once in a while, you run across people who insist they have not only
not been scammed, but that the scammers are providing a great opportunity, and only the "losers" who, for whatever reason, couldn't "cut it" complain.
I've encountered people like these, and after hanging out here and reading threads on PA's message boards, I think Ciggy Boy is one of them. I don't know if his books are any good or not--I haven't read any excerpts from them. Maybe they could have been published by a reputable publisher; maybe not. I don't know.
What I do know is that the people I've met who defended their favorite scammers and charlatans all have one thing in common--they have a pattern of making bad life decisions. They aren't stupid, but whatever they are defending is usually the latest in a list of schemes they have fallen for. They are the kind of people who talk as if their big break is just around the corner, and they are going to stick it out while all the crybabies and doomsayers bail out. They also tend to like being part of an "inner circle"--it makes them
somebody.
I don't really know anything about Ciggy Boy's life beyond what he has said on the PA board and in his forays onto this one--maybe he's the exception to the rule I've observed. [shrugs]
I personally don't see any other way to 'get back' at the person we're talking about than to ignore him -- if he believes he's the greatest thing since sliced bread, the one thing that will hurt him the most will be to ignore him.
If "getting back" at him is your thing, ignoring him completely will suffice. But I don't see that there is any way to not talk about him on this forum. If he spouts ill-informed, self-serving crap, somebody needs to point out that Mr. Emperor is, as usual, butt-naked.