Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write
A publisher or agency using Google ads to solicit your novel probably isn't anyone you want to write for.
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 109
![]() |
Differentiating between "And"
One grammar thing I have trouble with is when to use a comma after "And."
I don't know the rule. I know you put it when listing things (I went to school, the library, and later to the nightclub). How about two sentences like these: I put down the tray and ran to the door. Waverly got upset and I didn't know what to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 872
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I'd say that both sentences don't require a comma...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Means well
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 257
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
In your first example: "I put down the tray and ran to the door" it's not necessary, because only the first clause is independent. Your second example is an interesting (and potentially confusing) one, because in this case the comma is optional: "Waverly got upset, and I didn't know what to do." is correct, because the two clauses are independent -- that is, each can stand alone, as in: "Waverly got upset. I didn't know what to do." But equally, "Waverly got upset and I didn't know what to do." is fine, because the clauses are short. How long do independent clauses need to be before the comma ceases to be optional? Ah, well, there's a question. That appears to be a matter for writerly judgement, if not plain old common sense, in which faithfully representing the desired rhythm is a guiding principle. Last edited by pianoman5; 02-25-2006 at 05:21 AM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Angel, demon, hero, villain
AW Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Heretogether
Posts: 48,131
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() Love Sucks - now available at Musa Publishing, B&N, and Amazon "Fireflies" - Absolute Visions Taylor-Made - post-R&R querying A Paranormal Bromance - First draft done (NaNo) Quartet - Plotting Blog: http://sagelikethespice.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Fig of authority
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On a fig tree, presumably
Posts: 5,162
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Two answers for the price of one
Quote:
I went to • school"School" is a noun. "The library" is a noun with an article. So far, so good. But "to the nightclub" isn't a noun. It's a prepositional phrase. Not to get too technical, I hope, but the important thing isn't to have them all nouns or not; it's to have them all substantives or not. Nouns are substantives, and so are some other things. This is correct: "I went to school, to the library, and later to the nightclub." This is also correct: "I went to school, the library, and later the nightclub." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
![]() |
Quote:
I think part of the mechanism involved here is parallelism. For example it would be okay to say: I went to the school, to the library, and later to the nightclub. But if you ellipse the preposition in one of the succeeding phrases, then you should ellipse it in all of them (just to keep things parallel). I went to the school, (to) the library, and later (to) the nightclub. I'm not sure but I think this is more a matter of aesthetics, rather than a rule. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Fig of authority
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On a fig tree, presumably
Posts: 5,162
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Right, it's parallelism
It's a rule. A failure of parallelism is a fault in the grammar of the sentence. People need to return to diagramming sentences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
![]() |
So it is a rule. Thank you. I should have checked.
Yes, I'd love to see the return of sentence diagramming in school. You know, when I was trying to find reference books on diagramming, I called my local grammar school to see if they had any books on the subject. They didn't, of course, and the concept was so foreign to them that they had trouble understanding what I wanted at first. I had to laugh at the irony when I hung up. It was a grammar school for heaven's sake! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Esteemed New Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near the Big Apple
Posts: 225
![]() |
Yes, grasshopper, I had the same problem when I had chemistry questions in my elementary school . Or when I had substance abuse questions for my high school counselor. (ugh, sorry about that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
![]() |
I'm sorry, sacredmime. I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Fig of authority
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On a fig tree, presumably
Posts: 5,162
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(g'hopper), s'mime was punning.
chemistry . . . elementary school substance abuse . . . high school |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
![]() |
Hang on a minute. . . .
Chemistry questions in an elementary school . . . Abuse problems for a counselor . . . (Bing) the little light just went on. Good one. You deserve a rep point for that! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
practical experience, FTW
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
![]() |
Thanks, Reph.
I made the post immediately above before I read your post explaining it. I was on the right track, though, but still a little slow on the uptake. Still worth a point, don't you think? Last edited by (grasshopper); 03-03-2006 at 06:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
figuring it all out
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 77
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
To be a book-collector is to combine the worst characteristics of a dope fiend with those of a miser.--R. Davies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,651
![]() ![]() |
Excuse me, but I may be reading this the wrong way.
One grammar thing I have trouble with is when to use a comma after "And." All of the answers refer to a comma before "and", yes? "Today I went to the zoo and, ignoring the rain, I walked around for hours." I was taught at school that any clause, in the middle of a sentence, that could be taken out and still have the sentence make sense should be offset by commas. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Fig of authority
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On a fig tree, presumably
Posts: 5,162
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
come in, all you jesters
SuperModerator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: enter, all you fools
Posts: 19,906
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The comma after the and is a different proposition altogether; it's not mutually exclusive with this optional comma.
__________________
You take a feather from every bird, yeah But you never fly -- Dave Graney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Fear the Death Ray
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: wgasa
Posts: 43,746
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would normally write it this way:
Today I went to the zoo, and, ignoring the rain, I walked around for hours. or Today I went to the zoo and walked around for hours, ignoring the rain.
__________________
I didn't want to work. It was as simple as that. I distrusted work, disliked it. I thought it was a very bad thing that the human race had unfortunately invented for itself. -- Agatha Christie ![]() ![]() The Pacific Between • A Bunch of Stories (2006 IPPY Award) WIP: Beyond the Banyan Tree - draft 9, 125,000 words Home Page | Blog | Reviews |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
If this site is helpful to you,
Please consider a voluntary subscription to defray ongoing expenses.