Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: five feet two inches or 5' 2" or...

  1. #1
    practical experience, FTW
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    138

    five feet two inches or 5' 2" or...

    Hi,

    Coming from a nerd background we are typically are very lazy about how we write measurements in application notes. We will write 5 ft. 2 inch. for a measurement. What is correct for fiction Lit, five feet two inches, 5 feet 2 inches or 5' 2" when describing how tall a person is?

  2. #2
    The moving hand, having writ... AW Moderator Maryn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Creeping Up Behind You
    Posts
    35,078
    I was taught that numbers which can be written in one or two words are spelled out within text. I'd write He was shorter than the other cops, no more than five foot ten. But I would not write She was exactly five foot three and three-quarters.

    Of course, each publisher has its own conventions and might change it to meet their norm. As long as their check clears, I'd be good with that.

    Maryn, who knows which side her bread's buttered on
    Kindness. It doesn't cost a damned thing. If you're smart, you'll spread that stuff all over the place.

    Brick by Brick, a ménage à trois novel
    Taming the Wilde, spotted--and striped--in the wild
    Maryn Says
    , an irregular blog
    The Occasional Tweet

  3. #3
    learning to appreciate the world dobiwon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bon Air, VA
    Posts
    1,793
    This is quite a coincidence--I was just about post a very similar question about height. I agree that numbers are to be spelled out, but my question is a little different. I don't think Maryn's response exactly answered mine, but instead made me even more unsure:

    Would you say "He was five foot ten." or "He was five feet ten."? I've heard it said both ways. I always thought "five foot ten", but when I heard a news announcer identify a crime suspect as "five feet ten", it didn't sound wrong; as a matter of fact, it sounded more reasonable.
    --Don
    ===================================

    Walk With Purpose- Poems (mostly) and essays by Don Magin

  4. #4
    Relapsed insomniac :( ReneC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by dobiwon View Post
    Would you say "He was five foot ten." or "He was five feet ten."? I've heard it said both ways. I always thought "five foot ten", but when I heard a news announcer identify a crime suspect as "five feet ten", it didn't sound wrong; as a matter of fact, it sounded more reasonable.
    I use "five foot ten" casually, or "five feet ten inches" when writing more formally.

  5. #5
    practical experience, FTW
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    216
    I agree with Maryn and if you want to be specific, five feet two inches is your best choice. The singular spelling of foot for a measurement over one foot is an old form more common in non-RP areas of the U.K. and among those in America who follow a more provincial or folksy method of language acquisition (from family generation after generation rather than from school). Usually it is spoken without the inches, as in "five foot two, eyes of blue". By the way, should you could get published outside the U.S., many don't know that ' and " mean feet and inches.

    "Now Leroy, more than trouble
    You see, he stand 'bout six foot four"
    Last edited by Lance_in_Shanghai; 03-08-2008 at 01:31 PM.

  6. #6
    Scribbler SuperModerator dpaterso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Caledonia
    Posts
    16,913
    I'd lean towards less formal when describing human dimensions, "Crazy Johnny was six-two and built like a tank." Or in Brit-speak, "Crazy Johnny was six-two and built like a brick shithouse." Shrug, each to their own.

    -Derek
    Check out Bunneh's MS Wish List site!
    Agent "want" tweets and word wars!

    Check out my story in Timeless Tales Magazine's Perseus & Medusa issue!
    My web page! | My Sci-Fi webcomics!

  7. #7
    NEVER give up!!!! Danalynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Troy, Ohio
    Posts
    820

    Talking

    So would it be better to say:

    at over 6 foot

    or

    at over 6 feet?


    I'd lean towards less formal when describing human dimensions, "Crazy Johnny was six-two and built like a tank."
    Which is better:

    Uncle Thomas was six foot two, and my dad was only five foot eleven.

    Or would it be better to write:

    Uncle Thomas was six-two, and my dad was only five-eleven.

    * That's a point well put, and a timely suggestion that we'll bring up at the very
    next board meeting a week from Tuesday . . . I don't know why, it's just policy *


  8. #8
    This hat is getting too hot Chumplet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canader
    Posts
    3,146
    I was gonna say "short" or "tall enough for my feet to touch the ground" but that probably won't help.

    It depends on how formal the writing is. I'd lean toward "five foot two" and not worry about it till the editor gets her hands on it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Custom Search