If you all are so upset that I posted, move it to TIO. I don't care anymore. It's a literary topic about what works in fiction and what doesn't. If this is going to draw a hundred replies with 75% of them immature ad hominem attacks aimed at me personally, then I don't even want to participate in the discussion I started. I'd just assume the management deleted the whole string.
Gordon
Here's the problem; and it's one that's common in a lot of people's posts.
You make an unsubstantiated assertion:
Christ and God don't fit in fiction. They dissolve the plot, sure as gasoline dissolves a styrofoam cup.
You base this assertion on the experience of reading a single novel, by a single author who is know for very specific sorts of writing, from a niche publisher.
You say it's a good book--and then you say that you can't finish it; that's a contradiction in terms.
You then make some more assertions that, well, they're exceedingly naive in terms of basic Christian theology.
Finally, to assert that "T.L. Hines is a great writer," well . . . no, I'm sorry. That's just obscenely wrong. T. L. Hines writes fiction that fits a very very specific niche, for a very very specific audience. It's not great literature.
To say "I really like T. L. Hines," that's a very different thing, as is "I think T. L. Hines is great because . . ." you're asserting a very specific literary status.
You need to support assertions with specific evidence in the form of analysis; you do present "examples," sort of hypothetical plot elements, but that's less than effective because there are just as many counter examples -- and you don't really ever deal with your primary assertion.