I looked at the Sony PRS 500 and it looks promising. I see it can read pdfs will it read mobipocket books?
The additional effort to make electronic versions (once you have ebook rights plus all the files needed for a paper version) is trivial, so yes there must be a profit in it.the1dsquared said:There must be profit in it.
It's not just marketing, it's the price. I refuse to pay 100s of dollars for a "book" that I can't take in the bathtub, or leave in the sand on the beach or throw in my bag. On top of that, I would bet that, much like other electronics they will use a proprietary format and eventually become obsolete, requiring me to purchase a new reader that may or may not read the same book files as my old one. If there is bug or the reader is fried, there is a potential that my entire library could be lost. And what about sharing? If my husband and I want to read at the same time, we would need to buy two readers, and presumably his and hers copies of ebook files. No thanks.the1dsquared said:RG, it's good to hear that products are out there. But the lack of decent marketing means that they might as well NOT have been developed. Google ebook reader or ebook hardware. I got a bunch of oldish stuff that didn't sell me on any of them. I'm going to check out the products you mentioned, but price does matter.
From personal experience I know that the probability of me damaging or losing a small electronic device is many many orders of magnitudes higher than my house burning down. YMMVRG570 said:A house can catch on fire, thereby permanently destroying all your books.
In the end, it comes down to $$$. If the reader was $20 I'd give it a whirl. I'm not going to invest hundreds of dollars (plus the cost of books) for something I may or may not like to use.RG570 said:I can't get my head around the widespread resistance to ebooks, especially now that the technology exists to read them properly. Especially in the SF genre. I mean come on, half of SF stories have in them some paper-replacing gadget thingy! You'd think those authors would be the first to adopt this, but they're just as stuck in the old ways as everyone else.
That last point is the important one for me. I would love to be able to digitise (and index) all the titles that I seldom use, but don't want to lose. As for longevity and fire-resilience--as long as you have offsite backups, I guess.RG570 said:A house can catch on fire, thereby permanently destroying all your books. Paper degrades as well, while electronic files last much longer. Personally, I'd much rather be able to fit all my books on a flash card than have them take up all of my shelves, sitting there collecting dust. It might make me look smart to visitors, but it still is annoying.
Gadgets usually end up in landfills after a few years; books are far more likely to be passed to another user. As to which is more polluting to manufacture...my money is on the mining, refining and transport of the plastics and minerals that go into gadgets and their batteries.And then there's the environmental aspect, which I know doesn't fit into many people's opinions. But to me, if there's a way to eliminate paper that's just as easy to read, any other minor inconvenience incurred by this is worth it. Especially for magazines. Those are such a waste.
The incumbent paper standard has a 3D real-reality-based interface that's been refined over hundreds of years. Every aspect of the design being in the public domain, it costs peanuts and requires no proprietary hardware or software. The batteries last forever and the display provides top notch results in a wide variety of lighting conditions. Data remains accessible following most hardware failures (combustion being the most notable exception) and the device is user-repairable. The materials are biodegradable, and can be readily grown and recycled.I can't get my head around the widespread resistance to ebooks, especially now that the technology exists to read them properly. Especially in the SF genre. I mean come on, half of SF stories have in them some paper-replacing gadget thingy! You'd think those authors would be the first to adopt this, but they're just as stuck in the old ways as everyone else.
A couple of thoughts:Schoolmarm said:It takes as long to write an e-book as it does to do the print version, and I have my doubts that this will be a lucrative endeavor.
More likely a future in which the devices become less polluting, I would say. At least, that's my hopeDo any of you posit a future in which such devices might be banned? That would render e-books totally useless.
huw said:A couple of thoughts:
- might there be a market for a print version too? Will you retain print and other non-ebook rights?
- you say you've been approached to write these ebooks, and I presume this would be on a royalty-basis rather than an outright-purchase basis. Is the company approaching you established? Can they demonstrate a track record of selling ebooks in a similar subject/market area?
More likely a future in which the devices become less polluting, I would say. At least, that's my hope
You're out at the far end of the factory, trying to get a critical piece of machinery back together. It'd be nice to check the torque specs on the various bolts while you're actually at the machine, & not trying to hold a big thick book (smearing grime on it every time you touch it), & really wishing that you had a pocket-size backlit device (on a lanyard, to avoid dropping, wrapped in a Ziploc to avoid gunk) where, with a couple taps of your pen, you'd have the data you needed, & could get all the cross-reference data you need by tapping on the key terms.