• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Astronomy: AI found 8-planet system like ours in Kepler data

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
In 2013, the space telescope found seven worlds orbiting Kepler 90

Science News said:
Our solar system is no longer the sole record-holder for most known planets circling a star.

An artificial intelligence algorithm sifted through data from the planet-hunting Kepler space telescope and discovered a previously overlooked planet orbiting Kepler 90 — making it the first star besides the sun known to host eight planets. This finding, announced in a NASA teleconference December 14, shows that the kinds of clever computer codes used to translate text and recognize voices can also help discover strange new worlds.

The discovery, also reported in a paper accepted to the Astronomical Journal, can also help astronomers better understand the planetary population of our galaxy. “Finding systems like this that have lots of planets is a really neat way to test theories of planet formation and evolution,” says Jeff Coughlin, an astronomer at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., and NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif.

Kepler 90 is a sunlike star about 2,500 light-years from Earth in the constellation Draco. The latest addition to Kepler 90’s planetary family is a rocky planet about 30 percent larger than Earth called Kepler 90i. It, too, is the third planet from its sun — but with an estimated surface temperature higher than 400° Celsius, it’s probably not habitable.

The seven previously known planets in this system range from small, rocky worlds like Kepler 90i to gas giants, which are all packed closer to their star than Earth is to the sun. “It’s very possible that Kepler 90 has even more planets,” study coauthor Andrew Vanderburg, an astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin, said in the teleconference. “There’s a lot of unexplored real estate in the Kepler 90 system.”

Astronomers have identified over 2,300 new planets in Kepler data by searching for tiny dips in a star’s brightness when a planet passes in front of it. Kepler has collected too much data for anyone to go through it all by hand, so humans or computer programs typically only verify the most promising signals of the bunch. That means that worlds that produce weaker light dips — like Kepler 90i — can get passed over. Vanderburg and Christopher Shallue, a software engineer at Google in Mountain View, Calif., designed a computer code called a neural network, which mimics the way the human brain processes information, to seek out such overlooked exoplanets.

...
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
The seven previously known planets in this system range from small, rocky worlds like Kepler 90i to gas giants, which are all packed closer to their star than Earth is to the sun. “It’s very possible that Kepler 90 has even more planets,” study coauthor Andrew Vanderburg, an astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin, said in the teleconference. “There’s a lot of unexplored real estate in the Kepler 90 system.”

This is probably the most important part of the material you cite. The problem with finding Sol-like planetary systems is, in large part, the technology we currently have for finding planets. Using planetary occultation as a means of finding them limits us to stars with closely-rotating planets, whose orbits are fortuitously aligned with us in such a way that they pass in front of their parent stars with regularity. A system like ours would therefore be much more difficult to find. It isn't just a matter of the number of planets, but one of the distance of their orbits. The largest planet in our system, Jupiter, orbits only once every 12 earth years. The likelihood of Kepler finding even a big planet with those characteristics is much less likely than finding one that orbits every few days or weeks.

So the idea I've seen that our system is somehow very unusual among planetary systems is, IMO, very misleading.

caw
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
True; we’re only finding what our current instruments can find, which certainly skews the data.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,122
Reaction score
10,882
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
So the idea I've seen that our system is somehow very unusual among planetary systems is, IMO, very misleading.

caw

This is my understanding too. A selection bias has so far led to us finding planetary systems that are more extreme, either with regards to the size of the planets or with regards to their closeness to their stars (or both).
 

lpetrich

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
277
Reaction score
37
That is indeed correct. Neptune-mass Outer Planets Likely Common Around Other Stars | NASA has this graph of exoplanet sizes and distances, with the Solar System's planets included. There's a similar graph at NASA Exoplanet Archive, but without the Solar System's planets.

Most of the detected exoplanets are on the larger-size and smaller-distance side of a line between small size and large distance. That line indicates our current technological limits, and it must be noted that the Solar System's planets are near that line.